Impact of Pit Crew Resuscitation Model on Advanced Life Support Skills in a Simulated Setting: a Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 104
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The difference in the total assessment score between the intervention and control groups after 6-months follow-up.
研究概览
简要总结
In this study, a pit crew model is implemented in advanced life support (ALS) simulation training to student groups. The hypothesis is that the tactic model could help to maintain the CPR skills during the six month follow-up period.
详细描述
Introduction
Technical skills (TS) and non-technical skills (NTS) are two sets of skills required by Crisis resource management (CRM). Sudden cardiac arrest is a time-critical emergency situation in which both skills are needed - it's handled by a team rather than by individual health-care workers.
Because of the relatively rare nature of cardiac arrests in many wards and clinics, regular resuscitation training is necessary. However, the main part of the training is traditionally emphasized to technical skills. The recent research findings of the authors suggest that the TS and NTS seem to associate in a real life resuscitation. The authors wanted to investigate if pre-allocated tasks and positions (a pit crew model) helps to perform better ALS performance and helps to maintain the skills in simulated ALS situations.
Simulation-based education (SBE) is a key tool for teaching CPR. It has demonstrated its effectiveness in promoting skill acquisition and has been suggested as an ideal tool for teaching medical skills allowing learners to engage actively in their learning process while doing no harm to their patients but its effectiveness on improving anesthesiologists NTS is unclear as the matter has not been studied. SBE is particularly good method to create trainees a realistic medical crisis situation (scenario) created within a physical space (simulator) replicating the real environment where trainees goal is to solve the problem, do the diagnose and treat the patient. Afterwards, the simulation debriefing is an crucial part of the whole letting trainees and the instructor to finish the learning process. Traditionally such training has been a standard in professions characterized by high risk caused by 'human factor' such as in aviation and other high risk industries. On the other hand the benefit for maintaining resuscitation skills learned after single SBE is modest thus short - only a few minutes a week - but frequent SBE appears to facilitate transfer of new knowledge and skills into clinical practice. SBE has been shown to improve the satisfaction of learners and skill performance in the simulated environment but it's still unclear whether it improves the patient outcome. Simulation training is expensive though so other teaching methods like mental practice and e-learning could be useful alongside it.
Catchpole and colleagues aimed to improve the quality and safety of handover of pediatric patients from surgery to intensive care using the analogy of a Formula 1 pit stop and expertise from aviation. They introduced a new handover protocol which led to improvements in all aspects of the critical situation. Based on he same idea, a novel resuscitation tactic model (a pit crew model) was developed which predetermines the roles and responsibilities of each resuscitation team members.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
The partisipants are unknown of the study design. They are told that they have been randomized in two groups who receive ALS education in two different ways.
Two senior anesthetists analyse the ALS-performance of the video recordings. They are unaware of the study design. They analyze the videos independently and in random order.
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •medical student (fourth or fifth year)
- •paramedic student (third or fourth year)
- •nurse student (third or fourth year)
- •participated simulated ALS-situations e.g. in school before
排除标准
- •participated more than two real-life ALS-situations
结局指标
主要结局
The difference in the total assessment score between the intervention and control groups after 6-months follow-up.
时间窗: 6 months follow-up
The NTS and TS are evaluated with a valid measurement tool developed for this purpose by two independent evaluators. The instrument consist of 59 items (28 items for TS and the rest for NTS) and the scale of +2 to -2 is used. Additionally, raters gave a total assessment score of performance on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent)
次要结局
- The difference in ALS skills after 6-months follow-up.(6 months follow-up)
