nderstanding the preference for noise reduction in hearing aids: untangling the perceptual effects of speech distortion and residual noise
- Conditions
- hearing impairementhearing loss10019243
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON35308
- Lead Sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- Aged 18 years or older
- Native speaker of the Dutch language;- Normal hearing subjects:
o hearing thresholds of 20 dB hearing level or better for all octave frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz
- Subjects with mild to moderate flat sensorineural hearing loss:
o hearing threshold between 40 and 60 dB hearing level at 4 kHz
o air-bone gap * 15 dB
o no more than 25 dB difference between the maximum and minimum hearing thresholds between 500 and 4000 Hz
- Subjects with mild to moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss:
o hearing threshold between 40 and 60 dB hearing level at 4 kHz
o air-bone gap * 15 dB
o more than 25 dB difference between the maximum and minimum hearing thresholds between 500 and 4000 Hz
-Pure tone hearing thresholds do not meet the specified criteria
-Not native speaker Dutch
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The main outcome measures are the detection threshold for speech distortion and<br /><br>preference for different degrees of noise reduction. We will look for relations<br /><br>between those measures and other audiological characteristics (pure tone<br /><br>threshold, acceptable noise level, frequency resolution, temporal acuity, or<br /><br>speech intelligibility).</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>-</p><br>