Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07348458
NCT07348458
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

The Effect of Intraoperative Thermal Kidney Insulation on Current Kidney Transplantation Surgical Practices

iiShield0 sites20 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2026Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
iiShield
Enrollment
20
Primary Endpoint
Safety of the Kidney Protective Jacket

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a safety study designed to investigate the safety of utilizing the Kidney Protective Jacket (KPJ)™ during kidney transplantation. In general, we aim to use the device in all possible recipients, aiming to demonstrate its safety in the variable circumstances that may arise during kidney transplantation, e.g. single or multiple renal vessels, different-sized kidneys, and variable recipient size and weight.

Detailed Description

Kidneys obtained from organ donors necessarily undergo a period of ischemia whereby there is no blood supply or oxygenation of the kidney until the kidney is implanted into the transplant recipient. During organ retrieval, the kidney is flushed with cold preservation fluid, after which it is most commonly placed in cold storage (CS) solution until the kidney is implanted. This method reliably keeps the kidney cool, dropping its metabolic rate and ATP consumption, and aiming to minimize the ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) which is one of key determinants of early and longer-term graft outcomes (1).

However, once the kidney is ready for transplantation, it must be removed from CS in preparation for anastomoses in the recipient. The kidney at this stage is exposed to the 37°C environment of the patient's body temperature and begins to re-warm; this interval is known as the second warm ischemic time (SWIT). After it reaches a temperature of 15°C to 18°C, the degree of renal glomerular and tubular metabolic activity results in warm ischemic damage (2-5). The SWIT usually ranges between 15-70 minutes, depending on the number of vessels to be reattached, surgeon experience, and anatomical differences (6-10).

Multiple studies have demonstrated the changes that occur in kidney temperature during the transplantation process. A study by Feuillu et al. (2003) on 65 patients showed that mean kidney temperature at the time of removal from the cold storage was 1.6°C and 6.3°C when the kidney was placed in the recipient (3). Then, kidney temperature increased logarithmically reaching mean kidney temperature of 26.7°C at end of anastomosis (mean SWIT: 45.5 [22-85] min). Kidney warming speed was 0.48°C/min and was dependent on the length of time of vascular anastomosis (3). The other series on 152 consecutive adult living donor kidney transplantations showed the mean SWIT was 41.3 ± 10.1 minutes with a temperature of 5.4 °C at baseline which gradually increased to 13.7, 17.4, and 20.2°C after 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively (4). The percentage of kidneys with a temperature of 15°C or higher was 81.2% after 20 min and 97.5% after 30 min (4).

There is large scale registry data that demonstrates the deleterious impact of kidney rewarming during the SWIT on subsequent transplant outcomes. In particular, using large cohorts from Europe, Heylen et al demonstrated: (i) increased risk with respect to higher rates of delayed graft function (defined as the need for dialysis in the 1st week post transplant), quantified as an odds ratio of 1.05 for every additional minute (i.e. 5% additional risk for every minute); (ii) poorer kidney transplant function up to 3 years post-transplant; and (iii) elevated rates of death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio of 1.10) for every additional 10 minutes. This includes outcomes for all types of deceased donor kidneys (8). The longer the SWIT the worse the outcome - this effect is especially pronounced in circulatory death donors.

Maintenance of appropriate renal hypothermia is, therefore, not only important during preservation and transportation, but also when the kidney is removed from its cooled transport media in preparation for anastomoses (8,10). This cannot be achieved using current core cooling methods (i.e. direct intravascular perfusion) during anastomoses but must rely upon external methods and/or devices. Various examples of such devices and/or techniques exist, although they have had limited success, limited generalizability, impede surgical vision, and are prone to inconsistencies. There is currently no commercial product that allows cooling of the kidney to minimise the impacts of the SWIT time.

With this current context, we wish to undertake a trial of a novel device, the Kidney Protective Jacket (KPJ™), which will assess its usability and establish its safety in the clinical setting, and add significantly to worldwide knowledge of this process. Ultimately, this device aims to provide consistent user experience with good thermoregulation leading to minimisation of IRI from the SWIT. We anticipate this will translate into improving the recipient's transplant outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Masking Description

Participant and outcomes assessor will be blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • All deceased and living donor kidneys that are deemed suitable for transplantation
  • All suitable recipients who are 18 years or greater, and undergoing their first or second kidney transplant
  • All recipients must be able to provide full informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Paediatric donor kidneys (kidneys from donors \< 16 years in age)
  • Patients with a known allergy or hypersensitivity to silicone

Arms & Interventions

Kidney Protective Jacket

Experimental

Application of the KPJ to the renal transplant.

Intervention: Kidney Protective Jacket (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Safety of the Kidney Protective Jacket

Time Frame: Until 20 participants are recruited, baseline participant characteristics collected pre-operatively, intra-operative times noted, and incidence of serious adverse events at 30 days post procedure.

The primary objective is to assess the safety of use of KPJ™ (per its intended use) during kidney transplantation. Specifically, we are assessing the proportion of participants sustaining Serious Adverse Effects directly attributable to KPJ use (i.e., Serious Adverse Device Events \[SADE\]) in the time period of 30 days post transplantation. We also want to examine the safety in variable circumstances, e.g. single and multiple renal vessels, different sized kidneys, variable recipient size and weights.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Device related events(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Temperature change during SWIT (°C)(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Surgery time (minutes)(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Delayed graft function (%)(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Serum creatinine (μmol/L)(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate - eGFR (mL/min)(When 20 participants have been recruited and 30 days post transplantation procedure.)
  • Graft survival(30 days post transplantation procedure.)

Investigators

Sponsor
iiShield
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials