Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07144423
NCT07144423
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Neuroendoscopy-assisted Drainage Versus Burr Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, URANUS

Beijing Tiantan Hospital48 sites in 1 country770 target enrollmentStarted: November 19, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Enrollment
770
Locations
48
Primary Endpoint
Recurrence rate within 3 months after operation

Overview

Brief Summary

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a frequent condition in neurosurgery, leading to fluid accumulation between the meninges, brain compression, neurological dysfunction, and potentially herniation. The efficacy of treatments and their long-term outcomes remain uncertain, with no established standard. Notably, neuroendoscopy-assisted hematoma evacuation, in contrast to burr-hole drainage, enables direct visualization and thorough removal of the hematoma, thereby minimizing residue, lowering recurrence rates, and shortening drainage duration. This study will undertake a multicenter trial to compare these two methods and determine the superior treatment approach for CSDH.

Detailed Description

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common disease in neurosurgery. It is generally considered to be a closed fluid collection situated between the dura mater and arachnoid mater, formed by blood or blood degradation products. This collection causes a local mass effect, compressing adjacent brain tissue and leading to varying degrees of neurological dysfunction. In severe cases, it can induce brain herniation, endangering the patient's life. In recent years, despite the availability of various pharmacological and surgical treatment options for CSDH, the efficacy and long-term prognosis of these treatment methods and strategies remain not entirely clear, and a standardized treatment approach has yet to be established. Neuroendoscopy-assisted hematoma drainage is one of the treatment methods for CSDH, but its current application is not widespread. The core of this method involves neurosurgeons directly observing the hematoma structure during surgery with the assistance of a neuroendoscope, enabling them to thoroughly irrigate and aspirate the hematoma under direct vision and sever hematoma septations. This approach enhances the hematoma clearance rate, ultimately reducing the amount of postoperative hematoma residue. Compared with conventional burr-hole drainage, neuroendoscopy-assisted burr-hole drainage reduces the recurrence rate of CSDH and shortens the duration of postoperative drainage. This study aims to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing neuroendoscopy-assisted hematoma drainage with burr-hole drainage, with the objective of scientifically and rigorously determining the optimal clinical treatment strategy for CSDH.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

The design is open labeled with only the investigators for postoperative follow-up evaluation, the outcome assessors, and data analysts being blinded in all 24 centers. Before outcome assessment begins at every follow-up evaluation, the patients will be reminded not to reveal any information about their group allocation. If details of group allocation can be detected by the investigator during follow-ups, another blinded researcher will replace to evaluate outcome.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient (18 years to 90 years) presenting with clinical symptoms and neurological deficits of CSDH.
  • CSDH verified on cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Written informed consent from patients or their next of kin according to the patient's cognitive status.

Exclusion Criteria

  • No clinical symptoms correlating with chronic subdural hematoma.
  • Lack of mass effect and midline shift \< 5 mm on the radiological image, or no need surgery judged clinically by neurosurgeons.
  • Previous surgery for CSDH during the past 6 months.
  • Previous intracranial surgery for any other neurological disorder.
  • Poor medication conditions or the presence of severe comorbidities so that surgery cannot be tolerated, or follow-up cannot be completed.
  • Severe coagulopathy or a high risk of life-threatening bleeding (including any one of the following three criteria: prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged by more than 10 seconds; international normalized ratio \> 3.0; absolute platelet count \< 100×109/L).
  • Postoperative compliance is suspected to be insufficient for 3-month follow-up visit.
  • Reproductive-age women without verified negative pregnancy testing.
  • Participating in another research.

Arms & Interventions

Neuroendoscope-assisted hematoma drainage

Experimental

Under the guidance of a visualized neuroendoscope, the hematoma is thoroughly irrigated and evacuated.

Intervention: Endoscope-assisted hematoma drainage (Procedure)

Burr hole hematoma drainage

Other

The hematoma cavity is irrigated intraoperatively until the drainage fluid becomes clear.

Intervention: Burr hole hematoma drainage (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Recurrence rate within 3 months after operation

Time Frame: From operation up to 3 months postoperatively

To compare the difference in recurrence rate at 3 months postoperatively between the two groups.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mortality rate within 3 months after operation(From operation up to 3 months postoperatively)
  • Change of Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) between groups from baseline to 3 months after operation("Day 0", "Day 2", "Month 1", "Month3" after operation)
  • Change of Markwalder Grading Scale (MGS) between groups from baseline to 3 months after operation("Day 0", "Day 2", "Month 1", "Month3" after operation)
  • Change of Quality of life assessment (EQ-5D-5L) between groups from baseline to 3 months after operation("Day 0", "Day 2", "Month 1", "Month3" after operation)
  • Rate of complications and adverse events between groups within 3 months(From operation up to 3 months postoperatively)
  • Postoperative drainage time(immediately after the procedure)
  • Length of hospitalization(immediately after the procedure)

Investigators

Sponsor
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (48)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials