Osseodensification Versus Motor-Driven Expanders' Techniques for Increasing Bone Density With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Alveolar Bone Loss
• Interventions: Procedure: Motor driven expanders' technique; Procedure: Osseodensification technique

• Registration Number: NCT04609475
• Lead Sponsor: Nourhan M.Aly

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare and measure the amount of bone density and ridge width gained with motor driven expanders and densifying burs with simultaneous dental implant placement.

Detailed Description

Seven patients were treated by the osseodensification technique and another seven were treated by the motor-driven expanders' technique with simultaneous implant placement.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2019-10-14
• Primary Completion: 2020-09-04
• Status Verified: 2020-10
• Study Completion: 2020-10-04
• Study First Submitted: 2020-10-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-10-24
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-10-24
• Study First Posted: 2020-10-30
• Last Update Posted: 2020-10-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 14

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients requiring implant placement in the anterior maxilla until the premolar region.
• Patients are medically fit.
• The width of the deficient maxillary alveolar ridge not less than 3mm.
• Patients willing and fully capable to comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

• Atrophic ridge (2 mm or less) with no interposition of cancellous bone between the buccal and palatal plates.
• Uncontrolled metabolic disease (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes).
• Heavy smokers (>15 cigarettes/day).
• Acute oral infections.
• Untreated periodontal disease.
• Poor oral hygiene.
• Pregnant or breastfeeding patient.
• A history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region or treatment with bisphosphonates.
• Female patients using oral contraceptive pills.
• Presence of oral parafunctional habits.
• Surgical site needs to be grafted.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Motor driven expanders' technique	Motor driven expanders' technique	-
Osseodensification technique	Osseodensification technique	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Implant stability	up to 6 months	Stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis measured with the Osstell device instrument. The Osstell unit records a numeric value of 1-100 which is referred to as the implant stability quotient (ISQ). The measurements were performed and 3 mean of three readings were recorded.
Bone density	up to 6 months	This will be assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
Post-operative pain	up to 1 month	Pain was assessed using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The lower values indicates lower pain levels and higher values indicates higher pain levels

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University; 🇪🇬 Alexandria, Egypt