Cerebello-Spinal tDCS as Rehabilitative Intervention in Neurodegenerative Ataxia
- Conditions
- Spinocerebellar AtaxiasSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2CANVASSpinocerebellar Ataxia 3Multiple System AtrophySpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1AtaxiaAtaxia With Oculomotor Apraxia
- Interventions
- Device: Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCSDevice: Sham cerebellar and sham spinal tDCS
- Registration Number
- NCT04153110
- Brief Summary
Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a group of disabling disorders which currently lack effective therapies. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar ataxias. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study followed by an open-label phase, the investigators will evaluate whether a repetition of two-weeks' treatment with cerebellar anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS, after a three months interval, may further outlast clinical improvement in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia and can modulate cerebello-motor connectivity, at short and long term.
- Detailed Description
Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a heterogeneous group of disabling disorders in which progressive ataxia of gait, limb dysmetria, oculomotor deficits, dysarthria and kinetic tremor are the prominent clinical manifestations. Both the hereditary and sporadic forms usually present in young adulthood, and are characterized by atrophy of cerebellar or brainstem structures. Currently, cerebellar ataxia lack effective disease-modifying therapies.
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar ataxias. The present randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study followed by an open-label phase will investigate a repetition of two-weeks' treatment with cerebellar anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS, after a three months interval, may further outlast clinical improvement in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia and can modulate cerebello-motor connectivity, at short and long term. In addition the investigators will evaluate if tDCS intervention might improve cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome in patients with ataxia.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 61
- Patients with a cerebellar syndrome and quantifiable cerebellar atrophy
- Severe head trauma in the past
- History of seizures
- History of ischemic stroke or hemorrhage
- Pacemaker
- Metal implants in the head/neck region
- Severe comorbidity
- Intake of illegal drugs
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Real tDCS - Real tDCS Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) Sham tDCS - Real tDCS Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS 10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks). Sham tDCS - Real tDCS Sham cerebellar and sham spinal tDCS 10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).
Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).
Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale: 120 point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (most severe cognitive impairment) to 120 (no cognitive impairment).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF36) Score From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months The Italian version of the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36): consists of 36 scaled score, yielding a total score of 0 (more disability) to 100 (less disability).
Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale: 120 point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (most severe cognitive impairment) to 120 (no cognitive impairment).
Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).
Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).
Change in Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) Measurements From Baseline Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) is expressed as motor evoked potential amplitude (average of 10 recordings). Lower values reflect higher inhibition and thus reduced impairment.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AO Spedali Civili
🇮🇹Brescia, BS, Italy