Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05780203
NCT05780203
Completed
Not Applicable

The Effects of Exposure in the Context of Anxious Thinking Styles

Ruhr University of Bochum1 site in 1 country81 target enrollmentApril 11, 2023
ConditionsAcrophobia

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Acrophobia
Sponsor
Ruhr University of Bochum
Enrollment
81
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Acrophobia-related interpretational processing biases as measured using the Encoding Recognition Task
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The proposed study will apply a one-session exposure treatment combined with CBM training modifying interpretational processing biases versus a sham training in acrophobic individuals. The main aim is to advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying exposure treatment.

Detailed Description

The present study will apply a one-session exposure treatment followed by a computerized interpretational training (CBM) or sham training in acrophobic individuals. By doing so, it aims to better understand the mechanisms underlying exposure, i.e., the role of cognitive change. Specifically, this study aims to enhance changes in disorder-relevant cognitive processing post-exposure, compared to a sham training. Further, we hope to improve both therapy outcomes and the generalization of therapeutic effects.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 11, 2023
End Date
December 15, 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ruhr University of Bochum
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Beray Macit

PhD Student

Ruhr University of Bochum

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Acrophobia-related interpretational processing biases as measured using the Encoding Recognition Task

Time Frame: baseline, post-training (~1 week post-baseline)

Acrophobia-related interpretational processing biases will be measured using a modified version of the Encoding Recognition Task (ERT, Salemink \& van den Hout, 2010). Bias scores of the Encoding Recognition Task can range from -4 to +4, with lower scores indicating a more negative interpretation bias. The primary outcome is change in bias score from baseline to post-training.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Acrophobia-related interpretational processing biases as measured using the Encoding Recognition Task(baseline, pre-training (~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))
  • Heights Interpretation Questionnaire (HIQ)(baseline, post-training (~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))
  • Behavioral Approach Task (BAT)(baseline, post-training (~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))
  • Danger/ Anxiety Expectancy Scale (DES/AES)(baseline, post-training (~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))
  • Scrambled Sentences Task (SST)(post-training (~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))
  • Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ)(baseline, pre-training (1 day after exposure; ~1 week post-baseline), follow-up (~5 weeks post-baseline))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials