Combining Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Physical Therapy Interventions for Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Enrollment
- 25
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combined effects of non-invasive neuromodulation (specifically transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation) with exercise interventions to improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with Parkinsons Disease.
Detailed Description
During this clinical trial, participants will be randomized into two groups, with half of the participants assigned to GROUP 1: active taVNS + exercise, and half of the participants assigned to GROUP 2: sham taVNS + exercise. The active taVNS + exercise group will receive 15 minutes of active taVNS prior to treatment. Participants who are randomized into the sham taVNS + exercise group will receive 0 mA of current for 15 minutes prior to treatment. All participants will be guided through exercises by a licensed physical therapist, which will include: 1) intensive exercises that focus on increasing the size and amplitude of movements; 2) task-specific practice, which involves practicing functional tasks, such as dressing, bathing, and cooking, in order to transfer the gains made in therapy to real-life situations. The exercise intervention proposed involves the supervision of a licensed PT at all times during the treatment session. Exercise will be provided in a clinical setting, 45 minutes per session, up to 3 sessions/week, for 4-6 weeks total.
Investigators
Alexandra Evancho
Assistant Professor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Diagnosis of PD by a board-certified neurologist
- •age between 35 and 80 years
- •no walking aids
- •stable medication 4 weeks prior to and during the study
- •no falls in the past 6 months
- •participant must have MD who is willing to provide oversight and approval for clinically defined OFF state
Exclusion Criteria
- •mild cognitive impairment (MoCA \<25)
- •self reported depression
- •antidepressive or antipsychotic medication
- •participation in a VNS study in the past year
- •disabling bradykinesia to ensure patients are able to participate in intensive physiotherapy (based on clinical impression and in accordance to UPDRS part III item 14 - to be administered in clinic)
- •prior history of cardiovascular, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders known to interfere with testing PD features
- •implanted medical device of any type
- •history of seizures
- •peripheral neuropathy including temporal mandibular disorders and Bells Palsy, and
- •vasovagal syncope.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
In our study, we will utilize the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. This scale, widely used in the clinical and research settings, helps us evaluate the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS-UPDRS Part III scale ranges from 0 to 132, with 0 representing no motor symptoms and 132 representing severe motor symptoms. Therefore, a higher score on the MDS-UPDRS Part III scale indicates a worse outcome, reflecting more severe motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT): We utilize the 6-Minute Walk Test in our study to evaluate the functional exercise capacity of our participants. The 6MWT involves participants walking as far as they can in a span of six minutes on a flat, hard surface. The total distance covered in six minutes is recorded as the score. In this test, a greater distance indicates better physical endurance and mobility. Therefore, in our study, a higher score (greater distance walked) on the 6MWT represents a better outcome, signifying superior functional exercise capacity.
Ten Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
The 10MWT is a timed walking test commonly used in clinical and research settings to assess an individual's gait speed and functional mobility. It measures the time it takes for a person to walk a distance of 10 meters (approximately 33 feet). The scale title, in this case, is the time in seconds required to complete the 10-meter walk. There are no specific minimum and maximum values for this measure since it depends on the individual's walking ability. However, lower scores (i.e., shorter times) generally indicate better outcomes, as they reflect faster gait speed and improved mobility. Conversely, higher scores (longer times) would suggest slower walking speed and potentially poorer functional mobility.
Mini-Best Test
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and stability. It consists of 14 items that assess different aspects of balance, including anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and stability during functional tasks. The scale title for the Mini-BESTest is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 28. Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest indicate better balance performance and greater overall stability. A score of 28 represents the best possible outcome, indicating excellent balance abilities across all assessed domains. Conversely, lower scores indicate poorer balance control and increased risk of falls.
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a clinical measure used to assess an individual's walking ability and functional mobility. It evaluates various aspects of gait, including balance, coordination, range of motion, and adaptability. The FGA consists of 10 different tasks or conditions that challenge the person's walking abilities in different ways, such as walking while turning, walking over obstacles, or walking with eyes closed. The scale title for the FGA is the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores on the FGA indicate better functional gait performance and greater walking independence. A score of 30 represents the best possible outcome, reflecting excellent gait function across all assessed conditions. Conversely, lower scores suggest impaired gait function and reduced functional mobility.
mCTSIB
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment)
The modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate an individual's sensory integration and balance control. It assesses the person's ability to maintain balance under various sensory conditions. The mCTSIB involves four different standing positions, each with different sensory inputs: (1) feet together on a firm surface with eyes open, (2) feet together on a firm surface with eyes closed, (3) feet together on a foam surface with eyes open, and (4) feet together on a foam surface with eyes closed. The results presented in this section reflect the participant's composite mCTSIB score as measured by the BTrack Balance System. Composite scores range from 0 to 400. Higher scores indicate better balance control and greater sensory integration.
Secondary Outcomes
- Digit Span Test(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- MoCA(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition One(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- DKEFS Color Word Interference Test - Condition Two(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- DKEFS Color Word Interference - Condition Three(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- DKEFS Verbal Fluency Test(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- Digit Symbol Substitution Test(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- Flanker(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- Promise Neuro-QOL (Ability)(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))
- SF-36(Baseline, immediately post-treatment (after 12 study visits, around 4-6 weeks), and at follow-up (4 weeks after last treatment))