3D-4K-ICG Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
- Conditions
- Gastric CancerSurgery
- Interventions
- Procedure: Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in 3D plus Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection
- Registration Number
- NCT06161207
- Lead Sponsor
- Fujian Medical University
- Brief Summary
Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4a N-/+ M0) were selected as study subjects to investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in 3D plus ultra high resolution laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.
- Detailed Description
1. Research purpose: Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4a N-/+ M0) were selected as study subjects to investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in 3D plus ultra high resolution laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.
2. Research design: Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled, open-control, parallel assignment, superiority test.
2.1 Case group Group A (Study Group 1, 234 cases): ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in 3D plus ultra high resolution laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection; Group B (Study Group 2, 234 cases): ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in ultra high resolution laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection; Group C (Control Group 2, 234 cases) 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection
2.2 Estimate Sample Size The three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was the main effectiveness evaluation index in this study. The study implemented a superiority test (unilateral), assuming that both the study group's three-year DFS would be better than that of control group, according to previous research results of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced GC in which the three-year DFS was 65.2%; therefore, the 3-year DFS of the control group would be 65.2%, assuming that the 3-year DFS of the experimental group could be increased by 12% to 77.2%. With an inspection level 0.0125 (unilateral) and an inspection efficiency of 0.8 and using PASS 11 log-rank tests (Lakatos) \[Proportion surviving\] the calculated sample size was N=211; namely, each group needed 211 people, considering cases of possible exclusion and loss to follow-up (10% drop out rate). The final sample size for each group was 234 cases, for a total of 702 cases.
2.3 randomization After laparoscopic exploration and confirmation that the cases complied with the standards, they were included in the randomized groups in this study. SAS 9.2 was used to produce a serial number ranging from 0001 - 702 corresponding to the treatment allocation, which was reserved in the data center and research center.
2.4 Blinding Method: This research adopts an open design.
2.5 Research cycle: Estimated enrollment cycle: complete enrollment within 2 years. Follow-up period: the enrollment of the first case was the starting point for follow-up. And the enrollment of last case to the postoperative pathology report (generally 2 weeks after surgery) was the endpoint of follow-up for secondary outcomes. Three years after the last case was enrolled was the follow-up endpoint for the main outcomes.
Estimated time: 2023.12-2025.12 (complete enrollment) to 2028.12 (complete follow-up)
Study Objects All patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not conform to the exclusion criteria are qualified for this study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 702
- Age from 18 to 75 years
- Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
- cT2-4a, N-/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition
- No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other adjacent organs in the preoperative examinations
- Performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III
- Written informed consent
- Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Severe mental disorder
- History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
- History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR for gastric cancer)
- Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node (diameter over 3cm) supported by preoperative imaging
- Other malignant disease within the past 5 years
- History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
- History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months
- History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
- Requirement for simultaneous surgery for other disease
- Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
- FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second)<50% of predicted values
- Diffuse invasive gastric cancer
- History of an iodine allergy
- Patients who declined laparoscopic surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 4K-ICG Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in 3D plus Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection 3D Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in 3D plus Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection 3D Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection 3D-4K-ICG Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in 3D plus Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection Indocyanine Green Tracer Using in 3D plus Ultra High Resolution Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Lymph Node Dissection
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 3-year disease free survival rate 3 years Disease-free survival is calculated from the day of surgery to the day of recurrence or death
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and positive lymph nodes in Group B (false negative rate) 1 day Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and positive lymph nodes in Group B (false negative rate)
3-year overall survival rate 3 years 3-year overall survival rate
Operation time 1 day Operation time
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (positive rate) 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (positive rate)
Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (false negative rate) 1 day Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (false negative rate)
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group A and total number of lymph nodes in group A 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group A and total number of lymph nodes in group A
Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in group A (negative rate) 1 day Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in group A (negative rate)
Postoperative recovery course 30 days Postoperative recovery course
Postoperative nutritional status 3 years Postoperative nutritional status
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in Group A (false positive rate) 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in Group A (false positive rate)
Total number of retrieved lymph nodes 1 day Total number of retrieved lymph nodes
Noncompliance rate of lymph node dissection 1 day Noncompliance rate of lymph node dissection
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and positive lymph nodes in Group B (positive rate) 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and positive lymph nodes in Group B (positive rate)
Number of metastatic lymph nodes 1 day Number of metastatic lymph nodes
Intraoperative situation 30 days Intraoperative situation
Inflammatory and immune response 30 days Inflammatory and immune response
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group B and total number of lymph nodes in group B 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group B and total number of lymph nodes in group B
Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and negative lymph nodes in Group B (false positive rate) 1 day Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in Group A (false positive rate)
Metastasis rate of lymph nodes 1 day Metastasis rate of lymph nodes
3-year recurrence pattern 3 years 3-year recurrence pattern
Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and negative lymph nodes in group B (negative rate) 1 day Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group B and negative lymph nodes in group B (negative rate)
Morbidity and mortality rates 30 day Morbidity and mortality rates
Postoperative quality of life (measured by EQ-5D) preoperative, postoperative 1 month and postoperative 1 year Postoperative quality of life (measured by EQ-5D)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
🇨🇳Fuzhou, Fujian, China