A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With OncoVEX^GM-CSF Compared to Subcutaneously Administered GM-CSF in Melanoma Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIb, IIIc and IV Disease
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 437
- 试验地点
- 165
- 主要终点
- Durable Response Rate
研究概览
简要总结
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with talimogene laherparepvec compared to subcutaneously administered GM-CSF in patients with unresectable Stage IIIb, IIIc and Stage IV melanoma. The efficacy endpoints of the study aim to demonstrate overall clinical benefit for patients treated with talimogene laherparepvec as compared to GM-CSF.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Males or females age ≥ 18 years
- •Stage IIIb, IIIc or stage IV disease that is not surgically resectable
- •Injectable disease (i.e. suitable for direct injection or through the use of ultrasound guidance)
- •At least 1 injectable cutaneous, subcutaneous or nodal melanoma lesion >= 10 mm in longest diameter or, multiple injectable melanoma lesions which in aggregate have a longest diameter of >= 10 mm
- •Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels less than 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- •Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- •Prolongation in International Normalized Ratio (INR), Prothrombin Time (PT), and Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) when the result is from therapeutic anticoagulation treatment are permitted for patients whose injectable lesions are cutaneous and/or subcutaneous such that direct pressure could be applied in the event of excessive bleeding
排除标准
- •Clinically active cerebral or any bone metastases. Patients with up to 3 (neurological performance status of 0) cerebral metastases may be enrolled, provided that all lesions have been adequately treated with stereotactic radiation therapy, craniotomy, gammaknife therapy, with no evidence of progression, and have not required steroids, for at least two (2) months prior to randomization
- •Greater than 3 visceral metastases (this does not include lung metastases or nodal metastases associated with visceral organs). For patients with < 3 visceral metastases, no lesion > 3 cm, and liver lesions must meet Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for stable disease for at least 1 month prior to randomization
结局指标
主要结局
Durable Response Rate
时间窗: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.
Durable response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) maintained continuously for at least 6 months from the time the objective response was first observed and initiating within 12 months of starting therapy as assessed by the Endpoint Assessment Committee (EAC). This reflects all new sites of disease as well as disease sites identified at baseline. Disease assessments were performed at the beginning of each treatment cycle in accordance with modified World Health Organization criteria. CR: Disappearance of all clinical evidence of tumor (both measurable and non-measurable but evaluable disease); PR: ≥ 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable tumors at the time of assessment as compared to baseline.
次要结局
- Overall Survival(From randomization until the first 290 survival events had occurred (data cut-off date of 31 March 2014); median time on follow-up was 44 months.)
- Duration of Response(From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.)
- Response Onset(From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.)
- Objective Response Rate(From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.)
- Time to Treatment Failure(From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.)
- Response Interval(From randomization until the data cut-off date of 21 December 2012; median follow-up time was 20 months.)