JPRN-UMIN000014766
Completed
未知
A randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and tolerance of a new, reduced-volume, bowel preparation for colonoscopy ; a comparison between two different regimens - A randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and tolerance of a new, reduced-volume, bowel preparation for colonoscopy ; a comparison between two different regimens
Department of Endoscopy,Aichi Cancer Center Hospital0 sites400 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2014
Conditionsgeneral population
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- general population
- Sponsor
- Department of Endoscopy,Aichi Cancer Center Hospital
- Enrollment
- 400
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with the following clinical features were excluded: significant cardiac, renal, hepatic, or metabolic co\-morbidities, ascites, severe constipation (\<2 bowel movement a week), known allergy to PEG\-electrolyte solution, history of gastric stapling or bypass procedure, or a history of prior colonic or rectal surgery. Patients were excluded if there was a suspected diagnosis of intestinal obstruction because of advanced colorectal cancer.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
A study of Oral chemotherapy after completion of radiation and chemotherapy vs observation in Carcinoma esophagus.Health Condition 1: null- Patients of carcinoma of esophagusCTRI/2015/09/006204Tata Memorial Center300
Recruiting
Phase 3
Treatment of Alopecia AreataHealth Condition 1: L638- Other alopecia areataCTRI/2024/02/062980Dr Rakesh Tilak raj
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy & Radiation therapy vs observation following surgery in patients with esophageal cancerHealth Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K228- Other specified diseases of esophagusCTRI/2019/05/019335Tata Memorial Hospital
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of ventilation by Oxylator® EMX versus bag-valve device in pre-hospital emergency patientsMechanical ventilation needRespiratoryISRCTN20664878CPR Medical Devices Inc. (Canada)200
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Compare topical anesthetic patches, Rapydan versus EmlaVenipuncture, especially in children, is associated with pain and discomfort. For this reason, often use a local anesthetic.Therapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Anesthesia and Analgesia [E03]EUCTR2011-000750-37-NLIsala Klinieken200