MedPath

Does the Needle-pilot Device Improve the Success of Vascular Catheterization Compared to the Classical Ultrasound-guided Technique

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Ultrasound Guidance
Central Venous Catheters
Interventions
Device: Needle-pilotTM device
Registration Number
NCT04463147
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Brief Summary

Real-time ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter catheterism is recommended in order to reduce complication, in particular for internal jugular site1. Nevertheless, the usefulness of ultrasound guidance for subclavian approach remains controversial, in particular because needle visualisation is more complex as compared to jugular site2,3. New magnetic devices (Needle-pilotTM device, Samsung Healthcare) could theoretically allow a better needle visualisation and a better success rate. The investigators hypothesize that such device could improve the feasibility of subclavian catheterism. As this device has not been evaluated in patients, the investigators decided to perform a simulation study on a human torso mannequin. This methodology has been already used by Vogel et al in 20154. The main objective aims to compare the procedure time between conventional real time ultrasound guidance and guidance with Needle-pilot™ device.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
51
Inclusion Criteria

• all residents and practicioners of intensive care units in the Nîmes University Hospital, France.

Exclusion Criteria

• unavailability or operator refusal, and more than one year without subclavian central catheterization (for experienced subgroup).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experienced residents or ICU practitionersNeedle-pilotTM deviceexperienced residents or ICU practitioners in ultrasound-guided central vascular catheterization.
new residentsNeedle-pilotTM devicenew residents in ultrasound-guided central vascular catheterization.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First puncture success delayduring the procedure

comparison of time (in seconds) between first puncture and successful "blood-aspiration" on a "subclavian venous" torso mannequin.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Puncture comfortimmediately after the procedure

Operator puncture comfort feeling is assessed from 0 to 10 by each participants for each technique.

Failure Rateduring the procedure

Failure is defined as a puncture time \> 300 seconds. The criterion corresponds to an absolute value: failure or not

Posterior wallduring the procedure

Number of posterior vessel wall penetration

Cutaneous wallduring the procedure

Counting the number of times each participant will puncture the wall of the mannequin before succeeding in puncturing the vessel with the 2 techniques and comparing this number between groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU de Nîmes, Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

🇫🇷

Nîmes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath