Thrombectomy in Patients Ineligible for iv tPA

Not Applicable

Terminated

• Conditions: Ischemic Stroke
• Interventions: Other: Best medical care; Device: Thrombectomy

• Registration Number: NCT02135926
• Lead Sponsor: University Hospital Heidelberg

Brief Summary

the purpose of this study is to to compare the safety and effectiveness of stent-retrievers as a device class group with best medical care alone in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients who are not eligible for IV-tPA up to 8 hours of symptom onset.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, binational (Germany and Austria), two-arm, randomized, controlled, open label, blinded endpoint post-market study to compare the safety and effectiveness of stent retrievers for thrombectomy compared to best medical treatment alone in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients not eligible for IV-tPA treatment.

Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of the following two treatment arms:

* best medical care alone or

* best medical care plus endovascular thrombectomy with stent retriever (referred to as thrombectomy).

Endpoints in this prospective open label study will be assessed blinded to the treatment assignment of the patient (PROBE design). This study will be conducted in up to 20 centers in Germany and Austria. This is an adaptive design study, in which there are prospectively stated interim analyses with specified stopping rules, which allow for the possibility of the study to terminate early based on either a determination of study success or of the futility to continue further enrollment.

Up to six hundred (600) subjects, 300 per treatment group, will be enrolled and randomized in the study for the Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set. The randomization will be stratified by time from symptom onset and stroke severity (NIHSS). The expected duration of each subject"s enrollment is approximately 90 days. Subjects will be followed with assessments at 30 (+/-6) hours, hospital discharge, and 90 (+/-14) days post stroke.

A blinded core laboratory will assess baseline imaging to confirm vessel occlusion and determine ASPECT score, 30 (+/- 6) hours post treatment imaging to assess presence of ICH, and to measure core infarct volume.

The primary effectiveness endpoint for a subject is the blinded evaluation of the ordinal mRS outcome at 90 days post-stroke. The primary effectiveness endpoint analysis is a chi-square test of the difference in linear trends in mRS outcomes at 90 days post-stroke between treatment groups ("mRS shift analysis").

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-03
• Study First Submitted: 2014-04-30
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-05-06
• Study First Posted: 2014-05-12
• Primary Completion: 2017-02-01
• Study Completion: 2017-02-01
• Status Verified: 2018-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-06-05
• Last Update Posted: 2018-06-07

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: TERMINATED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 4

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient is ineligible for treatment with IV tPA according to licensing criteria (e.g.

anticoagulation, previous surgery, or beyond 4.5 hours after symptom onset).

• Randomization within 7 hours after stroke onset.
• Endovascular treatment is expected to be finished within 8 hours after symptom onset by judgment of the interventional Neuroradiologist in charge.
• Patient must demonstrate clinical signs and symptoms attributable to target area of occlusion consistent with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, including impairment of the following: language, motor function, sensation, cognition, gaze, and/or vision for at least 30 minutes without relevant improvement.
• Female and male patient between 18-80 years of age
• NIHSS Score of >7 and <25
• Patient signed informed consent (IC) form by patient, legal representative, or by an independent physician who is familiar with this types of illness if the other options are not possible.
• A new focal occlusion confirmed by imaging (MRA/CTA) to be accessible to the thrombectomy device, and located in the M1 of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and/or the intracranial segment of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA).
• Prior to new focal neurological deficit, mRS score was ≤1.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patient is eligible for and receives IV tPA according to licensing criteria
• Patient with an international normalized ratio (INR) of >3
• Patient is an active participant in another drug or device treatment trial for any disease state, or patient is expected to start participation in another drug or device treatment trial while enrolled in this protocol, unless approved by Sponsor.
• Patient has pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that could impede the study results or would confound the neurological or functional evaluations.
• Patient has carotid dissection, high grade stenosis ≥ 70% proximal to occlusion that requires stenting, or excessive tortuosity to gain access to occlusion, as determined by MRA/ CTA of neck and head.
• Patient has vascular disease preventing endovascular treatment (e.g. aortic dissection or aneurysm, no arterial transfemoral access)
• Patient has history of contraindication for contrast medium.
• Patient is known to have infective endocarditis
• CT scan or MRI with evidence of: Mass effect or intracranial tumor, or hypodensity on unenhanced CT and cerebral blood volume (CBV) drop on CBV maps on Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP), or, alternatively as per institutional standard, restricted diffusion on Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTs) of 6 or less
• Female of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant and/or lactating or who has a positive pregnancy test on admission.
• Patient"s anticipated life expectancy is less than 6 Months.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Best medical care	Best medical care	Best clinical care in dedicated stroke unit
Thrombectomy	Thrombectomy	All subjects randomly assigned to the thrombectomy arm, except those with rapidly improving neurologic symptoms or no angiographic evidence of occlusion, will be treated with the endorsed study devices (stent retriever).

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
mRS Shift	90 (+/-14) days after treatment	The primary endpoint of the trial is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcome at 90 days poststroke. The primary effectiveness endpoint analysis is a chi-square test of the difference in linear trends in ordinal mRS outcomes at 90 days postprocedure between treatment groups ("mRS shift analysis"). The null and alternative hypotheses are β ≥ 0 and β \< 0, respectively, where β is the treatment arm parameter in a proportional-odds logistic model with mRS category as response variable.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Health Status	90 (+/-14) days after treatment	Functional health status and quality of life 90 (±14) days after stroke (EQ-5D)
Infarct volume	30 (-/+ 6) hours after treatment	Infarct volume at 30 (-/+ 6) hours based on Computer Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging compare to predicted infarct volume at time of patients hospital admission.
Neurological outcome	90 (+/- 14) days after treatment	Good neurological outcome with 90-day modified rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 Good neurological outcome with 90-day NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) improvement ≥10 from baseline Excellent neurological outcomes with 90-day mRS≤1
Successful Recanalization	30 (-/+ 6) hours after treatment	For the endovascular treatment group successful recanalization will be defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (TICI) 2b or 3.

Trial Locations

Locations (19)

Institut für Radiologie Oö. Gesundheits- und Spitals-AG Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg; 🇦🇹 Linz, Austria

Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Aachen; 🇩🇪 Aachen, Germany

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum; 🇩🇪 Bochum, Germany

Klinische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln; 🇩🇪 Berlin, Germany

Klinik für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus; 🇩🇪 Essen, Germany

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Essen; 🇩🇪 Essen, Germany

Universität Heidelberg, Neuroradiologie; 🇩🇪 Heidelberg, Germany

Klinik und Poliklinik für Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention; 🇩🇪 Hamburg, Germany

Asklepios Klinik Altona; 🇩🇪 Hamburg, Germany

University Clinic Bochum; 🇩🇪 Bochum, Germany

Abteilung für Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; 🇩🇪 Erlangen, Germany

Kinik für Radiologie und Neuroradiologie; 🇩🇪 Dortmund, Germany

Klinik für Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Freiburg; 🇩🇪 Freiburg, Germany

Institut für Diagnostische & Interventionelle Neuroradiologie Universitätsmedizin Göttingen; 🇩🇪 Goettingen, Germany

Abteilung für Diagnostische & Interventionelle Neuroradiogie Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München; 🇩🇪 München, Germany

Abteilung für Neuroradiologie Klinikum der Universität München Campus; 🇩🇪 München, Germany

Diagnostik , Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln; 🇩🇪 Köln, Germany

Klinik für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin Behandlungszentrum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen; 🇩🇪 Recklinghausen, Germany

Abteilung für Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Würzburg; 🇩🇪 Würzburg, Germany