MedPath

BMI and Ultrasound/Clinical Assessments of RA Disease Activity

Completed
Conditions
Obsessional Erotomania
Interventions
Other: Power Doppler ultrasound
Other: Clinical evaluation
Registration Number
NCT03004651
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Brief Summary

Comparison of the level of agreement between Power Doppler ultrasound measured number of synovitis (≥ grade 1 on a semi-quantitative scale) and clinically defined number of swollen joints in obese (i.e. BMI\>30) versus normally weighted RA patients.

Detailed Description

Clinical evaluation of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is difficult in obese and overweighted patients, due to the fat pad located around the joint, that can over- or under estimate the number of joints regarded as swollen by clinical examination. RA in obese and overweighted patients has several distinctive characteristics as compared to the disease observed in normally weighted subjects: diease activity (assessed by composites scores such as Disease Activity Score (DAS28) or Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI)) is higher, while response to treatment and severity (asessed by radiographic progression) are lower.

Objectives:

Primary end point: Comparison of the level of agreement between the number of joints considered abnormal by Power Doppler ultrasound synovitis (≥ grade 1 on a semi-quantitative scale) and clinical examination (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI) in obese (i.e. BMI\>30) versus normally weighted RA patients.

Secondary end points :

* Comparison of the level of agreement between clinical and ultrasound findings in overweighted versus normally weighted patients, when joint count evaluation is based on another composite index ((DAS28-CRP et DAS44-CRP), based on the number of tender joints, and based on a joint by joint evaluation

* Comparison of agreement between obese and non obese

* Evaluation of the impact of other factors than BMI on the level of agreement between Power Doppler ultrasound defined number of synovitis and clinically defined swollen joint count

* Reliability between Ultrasound and clinical examination across the different investigation centers Study design: prospective multicenter observational study Inclusion criteria: RA patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria Exclusion criteria: patient simultaneously included in another study with blinded treatment; Steinbrocker class IV patients Outcome measure : Level of agreement between SJC and power Doppler US synovitis

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
121
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Obese PatientsClinical evaluationPower Doppler ultrasound on obese patients with PR comparating with a clinical evaluation (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI)
Non obese patientsClinical evaluationPower Doppler ultrasound on non obese patients with PR comparating with a clinical evaluation (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI)
Obese PatientsPower Doppler ultrasoundPower Doppler ultrasound on obese patients with PR comparating with a clinical evaluation (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI)
Non obese patientsPower Doppler ultrasoundPower Doppler ultrasound on non obese patients with PR comparating with a clinical evaluation (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the level of agreement between the number of abnormal joints and clinical evaluation18 months

Comparison of the level of agreement between the number of abnormal joints as defined by Power Doppler ultrasound (≥ grade 1 synovitis on a semi-quantitative scale) and clinical evaluation (swollen joint count (SJC) as componant of SDAI) in obese

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the level of agreement between clinical and ultrasound findings on function of patient's weight18 months

Comparison of the level of agreement between clinical and ultrasound findings in overweighted versus normally weighted patients, when joint count evaluation is based on another composite index ((DAS28-CRP et DAS44-CRP), based on the number of tender joints, and based on a joint by joint evaluation

Impact of other factors on the level of agreement between Power Doppler ultrasound and clinical exam18 months

Evaluation of the impact of other factors than BMI on the level of agreement between Power Doppler ultrasound defined number of synovitis and clinically defined swollen joint count

Reproducibility of the comparison between Ultrasound and clinical examination18 months

Reliability between Ultrasound and clinical examination across the different investigation centers

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Regional Hospital Lapeyronie

🇫🇷

Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath