Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02124447
NCT02124447
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Comparison of Efficacy and Patient Tolerability of Four Commercially Available Bowel Purgatives for Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience.

Medical College of Wisconsin1 site in 1 countryJune 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
PEG+E
Conditions
Patients Undergoing Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Efficacy of bowel cleansing according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BPPS)
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This will be a 4-way comparison to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and patient tolerability of four commercially available bowel preparations among patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in a single tertiary academic medical center.

Detailed Description

We will randomize 300 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening or surveillance purposes to receive one of four bowel purgatives. These purgatives include 1. Split dose 4 liter polyethylene glycol with electrolytes (PEG+E): Brand name GoLytely 2. Split dose 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG+Asc): Brand name: MoviPrep 3. Split dose sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid (P+MC): Brand name Prepopik 4. Split dose sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium sulfate solution (sulfate): Brand name Suprep

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2014
End Date
June 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Zachary Smith

Division of Gastroenterology

Medical College of Wisconsin

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 years or greater
  • Ability to understand and complete questionnaires
  • Ability to speak and read English
  • Willingness to participate in study
  • Colonoscopy is being performed for routine screening (i.e. no prior personal history of polyps or cancer) or surveillance (i.e. follow up for a personal history of polyps) purposes

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous bowel resection of any kind (small or large bowel)
  • End stage renal disease (ESRD)
  • Contraindication to bowel purgative
  • Necessity for inpatient admission to receive bowel preparation for any reason
  • Currently taking any narcotic/opiate pain or anticholinergic medication (since these may predispose to higher colon stool burden at baseline)
  • Currently taking stool softeners (e.g. Miralax, Amitiza, Linzess, lactulose) or stimulant laxatives (e.g. Dulcolax)
  • Subject did not follow appropriate dosing instructions for bowel purgative
  • Colonoscopy is being performed to evaluate a clinical symptom such as rectal bleeding, constipation, abdominal pain, or diarrhea
  • History of colon polyposis syndrome
  • Personal history of inflammatory bowel disease

Arms & Interventions

PEG+E

Split dose 4 liter polyethylene glycol with electrolytes

Intervention: PEG+E

PEG+Asc

Split dose 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid

Intervention: PEG+Asc

P+MC

Split dose sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid

Intervention: P+MC

sulfate

Split dose sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium sulfate solution

Intervention: sulfate

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Efficacy of bowel cleansing according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BPPS)

Time Frame: Patient outcome will be assessed at the time of the colonoscopy by the performing physician and ducomentation of this outcome will occur within 24 hours of the procedure

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patient tolerability and satisfaction(Outcome of satisfaction will be assessed on a single survey that the patient will provide the day of their colonoscopy and will be recorded by study personnel up to 30 days thereafter)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials