Validation of Ultrasound "Angle of Progression" Measurement to Decrease the Cesarean Rate
- Conditions
- Prolonged Second Stage of Labor
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Transperineal ultrasound measurements of AOP
- Registration Number
- NCT05779735
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
- Brief Summary
Ultrasound during labor and measurement of Angle of progression showed extensive prospective and retrospective publications since 2010. The investigators performed between 2013 and 2016 the only one multicenter, randomized controlled Trial comparing digital exam to angle of progression after a prolonged 2-hour second stage of labor with uncertain fetal head. The investigators consider a cut off of 120掳 to accepted vaginal birth among cephalic occiput anterior position This randomised PILOT study showed that measurement of Angle of progression in addition to digital exam reduced caesarean delivery from 41% to12% ( n= 33, p=0,06). doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.018.
The objective of this new study is therefore to validate the results of this PILOT study in a more powerful multicenter randomized trial (DELIVERY).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 182
- Nulliparous or multiparous women with no history of vaginal delivery,
- > or = 37 weeks amenorrhoea
- Cephalic presentation in anterior position (occipito-pubic position, left anterior occipito-iliac and right anterior occipito-iliac ) confirmed by ultrasound
- uncertain fetal head engagement on digital examination or midline fetal presentation in prolonged second stage of labor (at least 2 hours),
- Multiparous women who were previous vaginal deliveries,
- Presentation other than cephalic,
- Twin pregnancies,
- Posterior or transverse position
- Transperineal ultrasound for head-perineum distance measurement
- Fetal heart rate abnormalities requiring rapid delivery,
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery whether maternal or fetal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group 2 : Transperineal ultrasound measurements of AOP Transperineal ultrasound measurements of AOP The mode of delivery will be determined by clinical examens (digital examination) and ultrasound measurement of the AOP : * vaginal delivery is encouraged if AOP measurement is \>120掳 * cesarean delivery is encouraged if AOP measurement is \<= 120掳
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method cesarean delivery rate baseline Demonstrate that the angle of progression measurement would change by 20% the cesarean rate after a prolonged second stage of labor (2 hours).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Severe neonatal morbidity, in each group 1 month Severe neonatal morbidity, in each group, defined by the occurrence of at least one event below:
* severe biological signs
* moderate or absent biological signs but associated with perinatal events
* seizure
* severe neonatal trauma
* Fetal death or neonatal death.Number of complicated deliveries in each group baseline A complicated deliveries is defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following events :
* Failed instrumental extraction
* Sequential use of a second instrument,
* Difficult instrumental extraction defined as :
* vacuum detachment
* requires the use of a second instrument,
* extraction time \> 10 minutes,
* operator's impression of the difficulty of extraction,
* Shoulder dystocia by obstetric maneuverConcordance rate between the routinely AOP measurement and the centralized AOP measurement reading 1 month Centralized blind AOP measurement reading
Severe maternal morbidity, in each group 1 month Severe maternal morbidity is defined by the occurrence of at least one of the following events:
* postpartum hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy, embolization, conservative surgical treatment or blood transfusion,
* third or fourth degree perineal tears
* vaginal thrombus,
* cervical tear,
* surgical wounds
* sepsis, amniotic embolism, cardiac complication or renal failure.Rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit, in each group 1 month Number of newborns admitted to intensive care out of the total number of newborns
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
CHU de Lille - H么pital Jeanne de Flandre
馃嚝馃嚪Lille, France
APHM H么pital Conception
馃嚝馃嚪Marseille, France
APHM H么pital Nord
馃嚝馃嚪Marseille, France
H么pital Armand Trousseau AP-HP
馃嚝馃嚪Paris, France
CHITS H么pital Sainte Musse
馃嚝馃嚪Toulon, France
CHIC Poissy
馃嚝馃嚪Poissy, France
Hopital Saint Joseph
馃嚝馃嚪Marseille, France