Investigation of Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with Different Surface Properties and Geometric Designs: a Retrospective Clinical Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Implant Infection
- Sponsor
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
- Enrollment
- 3
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Marginal Bone Loss around different dental implants
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of surface characteristics and geometric design on marginal bone loss and bone quality in dental implants.
Materials and Methods: A total of 378 implants from 114 patients were evaluated in this study using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Implants were categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations were conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. After obtaining measurements of marginal bone loss and fractal analysis data, the significance of differences between groups was statistically evaluated.
Investigators
Mert Karabağ
PhD
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Implants with a minimum length of 8 mm
- •Implants with a minimum diameter of 3.5 mm
- •Availability of panoramic and periapical radiographs at T0 (immediately after surgery) and T1 (3 months after prosthetic loading).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Presence of a systemic condition hindering dental implant treatment and routine check-ups
- •History of regular alcohol/tobacco use
- •Presence of severe parafunctional habits (bruxism, etc.)
- •Prior grafting procedures before dental implant placement
- •Implant failure
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Marginal Bone Loss around different dental implants
Time Frame: 180 days
Number of Participants: 114 Number of Dental Implants: 378 Implants will be categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations will be conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. The distance between the most coronal part of the implant neck and the most apical part of the defect caused by marginal bone loss(millimeters) will be measured. The magnification ratio will be calculated by comparing the previously recorded implant length with the length measured on the software, allowing the determination of the actual value of MBL.
Fractal values around dental implant radiographs
Time Frame: 180 days
A total of 378 implants from 114 patients will be evaluated in this study using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Implants will be categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations will be conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. And measurement pre op post op fractal values