MedPath

Investigation of Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with Different Surface Properties and Geometric Designs: a Retrospective Clinical Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Implant Infection
Peri-Implantitis
Bone Loss
Interventions
Other: dental implant
Registration Number
NCT06148012
Lead Sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Brief Summary

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of surface characteristics and geometric design on marginal bone loss and bone quality in dental implants.

Materials and Methods: A total of 378 implants from 114 patients were evaluated in this study using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Implants were categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations were conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. After obtaining measurements of marginal bone loss and fractal analysis data, the significance of differences between groups was statistically evaluated.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
3
Inclusion Criteria
  • Implants with a minimum length of 8 mm
  • Implants with a minimum diameter of 3.5 mm
  • Availability of panoramic and periapical radiographs at T0 (immediately after surgery) and T1 (3 months after prosthetic loading).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of a systemic condition hindering dental implant treatment and routine check-ups
  • History of regular alcohol/tobacco use
  • Presence of severe parafunctional habits (bruxism, etc.)
  • Prior grafting procedures before dental implant placement
  • Implant failure

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RTEU Oral and Maxillofacial Surgerydental implant-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Marginal Bone Loss around different dental implants180 days

Number of Participants: 114 Number of Dental Implants: 378

Implants will be categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations will be conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading.

The distance between the most coronal part of the implant neck and the most apical part of the defect caused by marginal bone loss(millimeters) will be measured. The magnification ratio will be calculated by comparing the previously recorded implant length with the length measured on the software, allowing the determination of the actual value of MBL.

Fractal values around dental implant radiographs180 days

A total of 378 implants from 114 patients will be evaluated in this study using panoramic and periapical radiographs. Implants will be categorized into 19 subgroups according to the jaw where they were placed, length, diameter, surface preparation, type of prosthetic superstructure, and neck design. Radiological evaluations will be conducted based on radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 3 months after prosthetic loading. And measurement pre op post op fractal values

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Oral an Mazillofacial Surgery

🇹🇷

Rize, Merkez, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath