Neural Mechanisms and Augmented Efficacy of High-definition Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Upper-extremity Function in Patients With Subacute Stroke
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 152
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- Pre- and 3-month change in motor function of the upper limbs assessed by Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Upper limb hemiparesis is the most common sequelae in patients, severely impacting their independence and quality of life. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tCES) is a non-invasive and safe treatment, which uses a low direct current or alternating current to change the excitability of the cerebral cortex. It can induces long-term potentiation-like or long-term depression-like effects, thereby modulating the cortical excitability. In recent years, researchers have developed high-definition (HD) devices, which integrate high definition ring electrode configurations and incorporate direct current with theta burst stimulation waveforms. Diverging from traditional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which applies weak currents (0.5-2 mA) through two large sponge electrodes (25~35 cm^2) externally to the scalp for widespread non-specific cortical stimulation, HD-tES employs an array of small-area electrodes (1 cm^2) to control current distribution over localized cortical regions, thereby enhancing spatial accuracy. However, there is a lack of studies validating the optimal waveform for HD-tES, as well as clinical evidence in subacute stroke populations. The optimal unilateral versus bilateral stimulation modes and their neurological mechanisms for stroke rehabilitation also remain uncertain.
Detailed Description
This project comprises two sub-projects: 1. Investigation of Neuromodulatory Effects of Stimulation Waveforms and Optimal Stimulation Waveform for Patients with Stroke : a crossover trial will compare the effects of seven high-definition transcranial electrical stimulation (HD-tES) waveforms on neural excitatory or inhibitory activity in healthy adults. These waveforms include three excitatory wave forms (anodal direct current (aDC), intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), and a combination of aDC and iTBS (aDC+iTBS)) and three inhibitory wave forms (cathodal direct current (cDC), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), and a combination of cDC and cTBS (cDC+cTBS)), along with a sham stimulation condition. Changes in cortical excitability over a 2-hour period before and after stimulation will be tracked. Validation of the optimal stimulation waveform for patients with stroke will be conducted through a crossover trial comparing three excitatory HD-tES waveforms for enhancing affected brain activity and three inhibitory HD-tES waveforms for reducing activity in the unaffected hemisphere. Changes in cortical excitability over a 2-hour period before and after stimulation will be monitored. 2. Exploration of the Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral HD-tES in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare four neuromodulatory modes combined with conventional upper limb rehabilitation on brain activity and upper limb function in patients with subacute stroke. These modes include excitatory stimulation on the affected hemisphere (based on results from sub-project one, choosing from aDC, iTBS, or aDC+iTBS), inhibitory stimulation on the unaffected hemisphere (based on results from sub-project one, choosing from cDC, cTBS, or cDC+cTBS), simultaneous bilateral stimulation, and sham stimulation. The primary outcome will focus on upper limb functional activity and upper limb motor function, with other indicators serving as secondary outcomes.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Sub-Project 1 (Healthy)
- •Adults aged 18 and above.
- •Confirmed right-handedness using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
- •Sub-Project 1 (Post-stroke patients)
- •Aged 18 and above.
- •Diagnosed with stroke.
- •Post-stroke for more than 6 months.
- •Unilateral hemiparesis.
- •Sub-Project 2 (Subacute-stroke patients)
- •Aged 18 and above.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Sub-Project 1 (Healthy)
- •History of neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, brain tumor, epilepsy), psychiatric disorders (e.g., substance abuse, major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), or musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb.
- •Contraindications to transcranial electrical stimulation, including history of epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, presence of metal implants, cardiac pacemakers, convexity skull defects, or increased intracranial pressure.
- •Skin allergies, contact dermatitis, abnormal pain, hypersensitivity to pain, wounds, or ulcers on the head.
- •Participation in other invasive or non-invasive brain stimulation research studies.
- •Pregnancy or lactating women. (If female, must be postmenopausal or surgically sterilized. Fertile women must have a negative pregnancy test result. Fertile female patients engaging in heterosexual intercourse, as well as fertile male patients with fertile female partners, must agree to use effective contraception during the trial period and for 4 months after the last dose of the investigational drug, such as oral contraceptives, dual barrier methods, intrauterine devices, or abstain from sexual intercourse during this period; non-fertile women are those who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy or are postmenopausal.)
- •History of alcohol or substance abuse.
- •Damaged skin at the stimulation site, electrode contact, or device wearing site.
- •Long-term use of central nervous system affecting medications (such as antidepressants, sedatives) or other medications that may affect seizure threshold.
- •Other conditions deemed unsuitable for transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation by a physician.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pre- and 3-month change in motor function of the upper limbs assessed by Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test)
ARAT consists of 19 items,including grasp (6 items), grip (6 items), pinch (6 items), and gross movement (3 items). Each item is scored on a scale of 0-1-2-3, where 0 indicates the complete inability to perform the movement, 1 indicates partial completion of the movement, 2 indicates independent completion of the movement but with excessive time or difficulty, and 3 indicates a movement pattern that is roughly normal. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper limb functional ability.
Pre- and 3-month change in motor function of the upper limbs assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test)
The FMA-UE assesses motor functioning of upper extremity. Each movement is estimated by a 3-point scale (0-1-2). The total score of the FMA-UE is 66, and a higher score indicates that the patient has better movement ability.
Secondary Outcomes
- Pre- and 3-month change in motor function of the upper limbs assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)(Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test))
- Everytime report for the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [safety and tolerability](Within 10 minutes after each intervention session (a total of 15 sessions, 5 sessions/week, lasting 3 weeks))
- Pre- and 3-month change in sensory function of the upper limbs assessed by Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP)(Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test))
- Pre- and 3-month change in used and quality of affected extremity assessed by Motor Activity Log (MAL)(Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test))
- Pre- and 3-month change in quality of life assessed by Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (ML-SIS)(Baseline (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention session), after 3-week intervention (within 7 days after the last intervention session), follow up (3-month after post-test))