MedPath

Kinesiotaping Versus Pressure Garments on Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Lymphedema of Upper Arm
Burns Chest Left Lateral
Burns Chest Right Lateral
Interventions
Device: Pressure garment
Device: Kinesiotape
Registration Number
NCT06230913
Lead Sponsor
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Brief Summary

The goal of this randomised control study is to compare kinesiotaping and pressue garments in secondary upper extremity lymphedema following microsurgical breast reconstruction after severe chest burns.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of kinesiotaping and pressure garments on limb circumference, handgrip strength, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and limb circumference in patients with lymphedema following breast reconstruction due to chest burns.

The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the kinesiotaping group (n = 28) and the pressure garments group (n = 28).

To perform taping of the chest in the kinesiotaping group, the patient was asked to stand upright with the affected shoulder rotated externally. Five straps of the fan-shaped tape were extended to the chest toward the affected axilla with 15% to 20% tension, and the anchor was positioned without tension in the anterior axilla on the sound side.

In the pressure garment group, the participant's skin was washed and dried before applying the PG. The Premium Lymphedema Gradient Garment (Jobskin, Long Eaton, England) was used to apply PGs. This garment has a pressure gradient built into it, applying between 20 and 60 mm Hg for at least 15 to 18 hours each day for three weeks.

Detailed Description

The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the kinesiotaping group (n = 28) and the pressure garments group (n = 28).

To perform taping of the chest in the kinesiotaping group, the patient was asked to stand upright with the affected shoulder rotated externally. Five straps of the fan-shaped tape were extended to the chest toward the affected axilla with 15% to 20% tension, and the anchor was positioned without tension in the anterior axilla on the sound side.

In the pressure garment group, the participant's skin was washed and dried before applying the PG. The Premium Lymphedema Gradient Garment (Jobskin, Long Eaton, England) was used to apply PGs. This garment has a pressure gradient built into it, applying between 20 and 60 mm Hg for at least 15 to 18 hours each day for three weeks.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria
  • Microsurgical breast reconstruction after severe chest burns.
  • the patient's arm circumference should be at least more than 2cm but not greater than 8 cm when compared to the same site on the opposite arm.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Conditions that resulted in oedema or swelling,
  • medication like diuretics,
  • infections,
  • allergies,
  • other systemic diseases,
  • pregnancy,
  • bilateral lymphadenitis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pressure garment groupPressure garmentThe skin was washed and dried before applying the PG. The Premium Lymphedema Gradient Garment (Jobskin, Long Eaton, England) was used to apply PGs. This garment has a pressure gradient built into it, applying between 20 and 60 mm Hg for at least 15 to 18 hours each day for three weeks. The gradient counter pressure is applied using a gram tension.
Kinesiotaping groupKinesiotapeTo perform taping of the chest, the patient was asked to stand upright with the affected shoulder rotated externally. Five straps of the fan shaped tape were extended to the chest toward the affected axilla with 15% to 20% tension, and the anchor was positioned without tension in the anterior axilla on the sound side.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Arm circumference:12 months

To measure the arm circumference, the patient lays in a prone position with their arms relaxed by the side of the body. A measuring tape is used to take the measurement. It was measured starting with 3 cm on the ulnar styloid process and proceeding with 45 cm proximal, and additionally at the metacarpal bones and midhand. For an accurate reading, the tape was snugly wrapped around the arm. The measurements were recorded for both the affected and unaffected arms, and the difference between the two measurements was then recorded under the title "circumference difference"

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional disability - SPADI12 months

It is a tool to measure shoulder pain and disability. It consists of 13 criterias to assess pain and disabilty: 5 criterias assess pain and 8 assess disability. The reliability of its coefficients is ICC ≥0.89 and has shown high internal consistency.

QOL12 months

The was assessed by cancer-specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). It is composed of 30 questions, including functional scores (physical, social, emotional, and cognitive aspects). The functional scores ranged between 0 and 100, and higher scores indicated better condition. This questionnaire also included symptoms score (pain, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, nausea, loss of appetite, and financial problems). The symptom scores ranged from 100 to 0, and lower scores indicated better condition.

Handgrip strength12 months

a handheld dynamometer (78010, Lafayette Instrument Company, Loughboroug, Leics, England) was used to measure the hand grip strength. To record the hand grip strength, the patient is positioned in the standing position with their shoulder adducted, elbows flexed at an angle of 90 degrees with the forearm in mid position. The patient is asked to grip the device to the maximum of his capacity, the average of 3 readings are recorded.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dr. Gopal Nambi

🇸🇦

Al Kharj, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath