Usage and Health Effects of Embodied Conversational Agents Among Older Adults
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 52
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Logdata on use application
研究概览
简要总结
Rationale: Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs), could be a highly effective medium to address health behaviour change among older adults. As compliance to health advice is important for positive health outcomes, successful design of persuasive ECAs can have huge health benefits. However, insights in the mechanisms underlying usage and health behaviour change via ECAs are lacking.
Objective: The objective is to unravel the mechanisms behind the use of an ECA intervention, and understand the mechanism behind the observed behaviour change
Study design: A randomized staggered-entry waitlist-controlled trial will be carried out.
Study population: The study population consist of Dutch-speaking older adults, who live independently, are without partner, are retired, 65+ and possess basic computer skills.
Intervention: The application PACO has been created for (and with) older adults with the goal to motivate them to improve their eating behaviour and decrease their feelings of loneliness.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameters are use, loneliness, and eating behaviour.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Subjects are not exposed to any risks, nor have they any costs. They do have to fill in questionnaires and use the application. The duration and data collection moments are needed to gain a fine-grained understanding of the use, relationship development and health change process. For subjects, the main benefit is to gain insight in their health behaviour via the PACO-application. Although this might be experienced as confronting by some. The technology was developed based on sound theories, with input from the target group, so the investigators expect positive experiences and an improvement in participants loneliness and eating behaviour. However, this can only be proven after the study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Sequential
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Living independently at home
- •Living without a partner
- •No paid profession and at least 65 years of age
- •Dutch speaking
- •Able to use a tablet or computer
- •Internet connection at home
排除标准
- •Not willing to provide inform consent
研究组 & 干预措施
PACO
Participants are asked to use the intervention for eight weeks.
干预措施: PACO (Behavioral)
Waiting list + PACO
Participants receive the same intervention, but only after a waiting period of four weeks.
干预措施: Waiting list + PACO (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Logdata on use application
时间窗: 8 weeks
Amount of time spend on the application during the 8 weeks intervention period
Change in De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
时间窗: Four weeks before intervention to eight weeks
Score from 1-5, higher score means a better outcome.
Change in eating behaviour based on 24 hours recall
时间窗: Four weeks before intervention to eight weeks
次要结局
- Enjoyment via affect scale(Eight weeks after intervention)
- Classic aesthetics Scale(Eight weeks after intervention)
- Concern for privacy scale(Four and eight weeks after intervention)
- Active control scale(Eight weeks after intervention)
- System Usability Scale(Eight weeks after intervention)
- Perceived usefulness scale(Eight weeks after intervention)
- Rapport scale(Four weeks before intervention to eight weeks)
- Brief Older People's Quality of Life Scake(Four weeks before intervention to eight weeks)
- Change in Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scales(Four weeks before intervention to eight weeks)
研究者
Lean Kramer
Researcher
Wageningen University and Research
