Evaluation of Furcal Perforation Repair in Primary Molars With MTA Versus Bioceramics
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 76
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- radiographic success
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Furcal perforation is one of the most challenging procedural accidents during pulpotomy of primary molars and should be sealed as soon as possible to prevent bacterial invasion at perforation site and subsequent tooth extraction. The aim of the study is to compare bioceramics versus MTA as root repair material for treatment of furcal perforation in primary molars
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 4 Years to 7 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Apparently healthy children aged from 4 to 7 years
- •No history of spontaneous pain or swelling
- •No signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpits or loss of vitality
- •Absence of radicular or priapical lesions.
- •Accidental furcal perforation should be immediate or mediate (within two weeks) perforation in primary molars.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Children with systemic disease
- •Presence of priapical lesions
Arms & Interventions
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
Root repair material
Intervention: Bioceramics (Other)
bioceramics
Root repair material
Intervention: Bioceramics (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
radiographic success
Time Frame: 9 months
Radiolucency assessment (+/-)
clinical success
Time Frame: 9 months
Visual oral examination
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Ahmad Elheeny
Clinical Professor
Minia University
