跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03453905
NCT03453905Unknown不适用

Evaluation of the Ability of CT-based Finite Element Analysis (CTFEA) to Predict Fractures in Patients With Metastases: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center0 个研究点目标入组 162 人开始时间: 2018年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
162
主要终点
Primary efficacy hypothesis

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with metastases to proximal femur, who are evaluated fr the risk of pathologic fracture in order to decide on preventive fixation vs follow-up constitute the study population. The patients will be randomized in two arms. First arm - the decision of treatment will rely on conventional decision algorithm including specialist judgement and Mirels' score. Second arm- the decision on treatment will be supported by CTFEA analysis of bone structure and quantitative simulation-based estimate of fracture risk, in addition to the conventional decision algorithm. Operation rates, pathologic fracture rates and additional secondary outcomes will be compared between the two study arms.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 120 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Metastatic bone disease of femur
  • Patients who undergo a CT scan (soft tissue kernel/filter, 120 kVp), and have at least 2/3 of both femurs visible in the CT scan. If CT scan is performed at the Sourasky medical center it must be according to the protocol in Appendix A.

排除标准

  • Ipsilateral previous surgery with or without implants
  • Low quality CT scan or CT does not include at least 2/3 of the femurs.
  • History of fractures, radiation or surgeries in lower limbs.
  • Inability to provide informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

CTFEA

Experimental

Decision on preventive surgery vs follow-up will be based on expert judgement, Mirels' score and CTFEA

干预措施: CTFEA (Diagnostic Test)

Mirels

Other

Decision on preventive surgery vs follow-up will be based on expert judgement and Mirels' score

干预措施: Conventional decision algorithm (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Primary efficacy hypothesis

时间窗: four years

To compare proportion of patients undergoing surgery in the treatment group vs the control group.

次要结局

  • Composite endpoint(4 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Evaluation of the Ability of CT-based Finite Element... | 临床试验