Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01962415
NCT01962415
Recruiting
Phase 2

A Phase II Study of Reduced Intensity Conditioning in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults ≤55 Years of Age With Non-Malignant Disorders Undergoing Umbilical Cord Blood, Bone Marrow, or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Paul Szabolcs1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentFebruary 4, 2014

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Hydroxyurea
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Paul Szabolcs
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Post-transplant treatment-related mortality (TRM)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
4 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of using a reduced-intensity condition (RIC) regimen with umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT), double cord UCBT, matched unrelated donor (MUD) bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) in patients with non-malignant disorders that are amenable to treatment with hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). After transplant, subjects will be followed for late effects and for ongoing graft success.

Detailed Description

For some non-malignant diseases (NMD; i.e., thalassemia, sickle cell disease, most immune deficiencies) a hematopoietic stem cell transplant may be curative by healthy donor stem cell engraftment alone. HSCT in patients with NMD differs from that in malignant disorders for two important reasons: 1) these patients are typically naïve to chemotherapy and immunosuppression. This may potentially lead to difficulties with engraftment. And 2) RIC with subsequent bone marrow chimerism may be beneficial even in mixed chimerism and result in decreased transplant-related mortality (TRM). Nevertheless, any previous organ damage, as a result of the underlying disease, may remain present after the HSCT. For other diseases (metabolic disorders, some immunodeficiencies, etc.), a transplant is not curative. For these diseases, the main intent of the transplant is to slow down, or stop, the progress of the disease. In select few cases/diseases, the presence of healthy bone marrow derived cells may even prevent progression and prevent neurological decline. Research funds are not available to assist with enrollment on this trial. In this research study, instead of using the standard myeloablative conditioning, the study doctor is using RIC, in which significantly lower doses of chemotherapy will be used. The lower doses may not eradicate every stem cell in the patient's bone marrow, however, in the presented combination, the intention is to eliminate already formed immune cells and provide maximum growth advantage to healthy donor stem cells. This paves the way to successful engraftment of donor stem cells. Engrafting donor stem cells can outcompete, and donor lymphocytes could suppress, the patients' surviving stem cells. With RIC, the side effects on the brain, heart, lung, liver, and other organ functions are less severe and late toxic effects should also be reduced. The purpose of this study is to collect data from the patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning before HSCT, and compare it to the standard myeloablative conditioning. It is expected there will be therapeutic benefits, paired with better survival rate, less organ toxicity and improved quality of life, following the RIC compared to the myeloablative regimen.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 4, 2014
End Date
November 1, 2027
Last Updated
4 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Paul Szabolcs
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Paul Szabolcs

Chief, BMT-CT at CHP of UPMC and Professor of Pediatrics and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

UCBT:transfusion dependent anemias or increased rejection risk

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Hydroxyurea

UCBT:transfusion dependent anemias or increased rejection risk

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Alemtuzumab

UCBT:transfusion dependent anemias or increased rejection risk

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Fludarabine

UCBT:transfusion dependent anemias or increased rejection risk

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Melphalan

UCBT:transfusion dependent anemias or increased rejection risk

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Thiotepa

BMT, PBSCT and not transfusion dependent UCBT

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Hydroxyurea

BMT, PBSCT and not transfusion dependent UCBT

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Alemtuzumab

BMT, PBSCT and not transfusion dependent UCBT

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Fludarabine

BMT, PBSCT and not transfusion dependent UCBT

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Melphalan

BMT, PBSCT and not transfusion dependent UCBT

Alemtuzumab, Hydroxyurea, Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Thiotepa conditioning regimen prior to allogenic HSCT.

Intervention: Thiotepa

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Post-transplant treatment-related mortality (TRM)

Time Frame: 1 year post-transplant

The number of deaths related to the research intervention at day 100, 6 months, and 1 year post-transplant.

GVHD occurrence

Time Frame: 1 year post-transplant

Description of the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (II-IV) and chronic extensive GVHD.

Immune Reconstitution

Time Frame: 1 year post-transplant

Evaluation of the pace of immune reconstitution.

Severe opportunistic infections

Time Frame: 1 year post-transplant

Evaluation of the incidence of severe opportunistic infections.

Neurodevelopmental milestones

Time Frame: 1 year post-transplant

Evaluation of the pace of attaining neurodevelopmental milestones after reduced-intensity conditioning as compared to myeloablative conditioning historical controls from the target population(s).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Late graft failure(1 year post-transplant)
  • Neutrophil recovery(1 year post-transplant)
  • Donor cell engraftment(6 months post-transplant)
  • Normal enzyme level(1 year post-transplant)
  • Grade 3-4 organ toxicity(1 year post-transplant)
  • Platelet recovery(1 year post-transplant)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials