The effect of mirror therapy associated with electrical stimulation on the patient's arm function after stroke
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Strokehemiparesis.I69.4C10.228.140.300.775C10.597.636
- Registration Number
- RBR-4z5bxd
- Lead Sponsor
- niversidade de Guarulhos
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruitment completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
Patients over the age of 40 years;
Patients diagnosed with stroke for at least one year;
Possess upper limb sequelae;
Absence of musculoskeletal deformities;
Be able to perform the test exercises;
Not afraid of performing electrostimulation.
Exclusion Criteria
Children;
Have plegia in the upper limbs;
Unable to perform the test exercises;
Shoulder injury;
Lower limb sequelae;
Not being available to perform the search.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Performance of the WOLF and Fugl Meyer motor function test after 10 electrostimulation-associated mirror therapy interventions: The participant showed a 16% improvement compared to the initial and final scores on the completion of the WOLF test tasks. denotes improvement in paretic upper limb functionality.<br>Regarding the Fugl Meyer Scale, the participant obtained evolution in the active motricity items.<br>and synergistic movements combined with a 16.6% improvement over the score obtained at the time of assessment and reassessment, showed an improvement in the passive joint movement item with an increase of 12.5% and in the joint pain item with an increase of 58%. , 3% in relation to the total percentage of the evaluation.<br>;Evolution in the performance of 9 out of the 15 functional tasks requested to the patient, obtaining maximum score in two specific tasks at the time of reevaluation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The WOLF motor function test showed a big difference after the intervention. In addition to the improvement in the task scores, there was a clear reduction in the execution time of all activities requested to the practitioner, which also indicates improvement of the affected upper limb functionality.