A Pragmatic Trial to Evaluate the Impact of an Inpatient Psychosocial Transitional Group to Improve Mental Health Outcomes Following Limb Loss
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 52
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores
研究概览
简要总结
People with limb loss receiving inpatient rehabilitation are at greater risk for depression and anxiety, social isolation, and generally have poorer quality of life. To proactively address the mental health needs of this population, St. John's Rehab recruited two psychiatrists to provide mental health support to their inpatient population groups. Because there are limits to mental health resources and because group therapy facilitates patients learning from each other, the investigators plan to test an innovative psychological group therapy program designed for limb loss inpatients to address mental health challenges, and to better prepare them to integrate back into the community. Our designed psychosocial group therapy is led by a psychiatrist and an occupational therapist who create a structured process for inpatients to discuss their challenges and identify coping strategies that will help them transition back into the community. The investigators will recruit 130 inpatients with limb loss, with 65 taking part in a weekly psychosocial group therapy program and 65 receiving treatment as usual. The investigators will evaluate if anxiety and depression significantly decreases in our treatment group compared to those who received treatment as usual. The findings of this work will provide needed evidence for the clinical feasibility and utility of a rehabilitation inpatient group therapy program, which can serve as a useful model for other limb loss sites across Canada.
详细描述
The investigators will conduct a pragmatic trial with a weekly supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) intervention for inpatients with limb loss, at a free-standing rehabilitation hospital in Toronto, Canada. This is pragmatic research trial that has stemmed from our feasibility trial involving therapy SEGT for dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) inpatients. Pragmatic trials stand in contrast to randomized controlled trials (RCT's), which instead examine causal relationships and are characterized by rigorous designs, featuring randomization, blinding and allocation concealment, to eliminate bias. Despite yielding results with high internal validity and statistical credibility, RCT's are not always generalizable to real life practice. Perhaps to address this, pragmatic trials are growing in popularity. Pragmatic trials aim to test interventions in routine clinical settings "to maximize applicability and generalizability" as well as to determine whether an intervention works under "real life" conditions. As a complement to our previous feasibility trial, the goal of this work is to understand the effectiveness of SEGT upon mental health outcomes among individuals with limb loss. Hence, the objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a pragmatic trial using a SEGT intervention for addressing anxiety and depression for inpatients with limb loss.
This two-arm pragmatic trial will evaluate if SEGT leads to better mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety) for inpatients with limb loss compared to those patients who receive treatment as usual (TAU).
Over a 2 year period, 130 inpatients will be recruited for this trial, with 65 being assigned to the SEGT arm and 65 to a TAU condition who receive standard care only (which may include an individual psychiatric consultation).
The proposed intervention is based on the evidence-based supportive-expressive (SEGT) approach and was designed by an interprofessional team from psychiatry, social work, physiatry and occupational therapy, along with patient advisors. The SEGT approach fosters mutual support, promotes openness and emotional expression. It has been shown to yield improvements in anxiety, psychosocial functioning, health literacy, and social support in breast cancer survivors. This SEGT approach has been modified, in both content and process, to specifically address the needs of limb loss inpatients.
SEGT will be delivered and co-facilitated by either a psychiatrist and/or two allied healthcare professionals supervised by a psychiatrist on a rolling basis for a duration of 1 year or until the intended sample size is achieved. Typically, it is a 6-module program held over a 3-week period (approximately 1 hour sessions X 2 week) that is framed within social cognitive theory, whereby resilience to adversity (limb loss in this instance) relies on personal enablement. Enablement serves to equip the individual with the personal resources to cultivate their self-efficacy and mastery and to select and construct environments that promote successful adaption. For the purposes of this trial, SEGT sessions will be offered on a rolling basis - which means it will be offered once a week, and participants may join the sessions at any time as the sessions will follow a similar framework over a six-modules.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •English-speaking
- •18 years of age or older
- •Admitted to St. John's Rehab inpatient
- •Any etiology and level limb loss
- •Medically stable
- •No clinical suspicion of cognitive impairment
- •No history of active psychosis or unmanaged major psychiatric disorder
排除标准
- •Actively suicidal
- •Unable to participate effectively in a group setting (e.g. actively using substances, exhibiting threatening behaviors)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores
时间窗: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item questionnaire that is employed to assess and diagnose depression. The instrument score provides a range from 0-27, as each item can be ranked from 0(not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). If 5 or more of the 9 depressive symptoms have been present for "more than half the days" in the past 2 weeks, and 1 of the symptoms is depressed mood or anhedonia, a patient is diagnosed with major depression. Other depression is diagnosed if less than 5 depressive symptoms have been present at least "more than half the days" in the past 2 weeks, and 1 of the symptoms is depressed mood or anhedonia.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) scores
时间窗: A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge
The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that examines one's anxiety health status in the past 2 weeks. The instrument scores range from 0-21, as each item can be scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). A score of 5 indicates mild anxiety, while scores of 10 and 15 indicate moderate and severe anxiety respectively. Referral is recommended for scores that reach 10 or above.
次要结局
- Change in PTSD Checklist- 5 (PCL-5) scores(A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge)
- Change in Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) scores(A. 24-48 hours before intervention (baseline) B. 48-72 hours after intervention ends (discharge) C.3 months post-discharge)
研究者
Dr. Rosalie Steinberg
Staff Psychiatrist
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
