Effectiveness of an Oxygen-nitrous Oxide Mixture During Physical Therapy for Frozen Shoulder
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis
- Interventions
- Drug: PlaceboDrug: equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture
- Registration Number
- NCT01087229
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the use of an equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide during the physical therapy for patients suffering from frozen shoulder (adhesive shoulder capsulitis) results in a gain in shoulder amplitude (Constant Score) and less pain as compared to patients undergoing physical therapy without this treatment.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
- Affiliated with a social security system
- Has signed the consent form
- Patient has a painful, or initially painful but stable frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis): stiffening characterized by a passive loss of amplitude on three planes. This loss of amplitude is greater than or equal to 50% of controlateral amplitude when the controlateral shoulder is considered as normal. Otherwise, the loss of amplitude is greater than or equal to 50% of normal anatomical values.
- Radiography confirms the integrity of the glenohumeral interspace.
- Intercurrent, evolving or unstable pathology: cancer, advanced cardio-vascular pathology, severe infection
- The patient is taking a treatment that may interfere with the study (eg corticoids, pain killers, chemotherapy)
- Contra-indication for physical therapy
- Coagulopathy
- Advanced diabetes mellitus, with neurological or joint complications
- Contra indication for the experimental treatment
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Patient's mental state prevents him/her from understanding the nature of the study, its objectives and potential consequences.
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- Patient not able to follow protocol constraints or timetable
- Medical history of local infection, polyarthritis or neuropathy that might explain the shoulder pain.
- Absence of radiculopathy of cervical origin, of rotator cuff tears or evolving shoulder tendinopathy, of severe omarthrose
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo Patients randomized to this arm will have the placebo. equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture Kinesitherapy is performed with a mask by which patient inhales an equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the Constant Score using treatment as compared to without treatment. fifteen days of physical therapy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global abduction of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global anterior flexion of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global lateral flexion of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global external rotation (ER2) of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Functional improvement Day 180 Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH)
Pain at visits At each session: final session on Day 15 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS)
Pain induced during sessions At each session: final session on Day 15 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS)
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global lateral flexion of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral flexion of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral abduction of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global external rotation (ER2) of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global internal rotation of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral external rotation (ER1) of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global anterior flexion of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
patient satisfaction At each session: final session on Day 15 0-10 VAS: 10=session interrupted due to pain; 0= session completed under perfect conditions
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global abduction of the shoulder Final session on Day 15 Range of motion in degrees
Change in the Constant Score using treatment as compared to without treatment Day 180 Patient Quality of life Day 180 MOS-SF36 score
Antalgic intake Until end of study (Day 180) Discriptively noted
Limitations posed to the physiotherapist activity due to patient pain at each session At each session: final session on Day 15 Likert six-point scale (none, to extremely high)
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
Unité Rééducation Réadaptation Locomotrice
🇫🇷Le Grau du Roi, Gard, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
🇫🇷Nîmes, Gard, France
CHU de Clermont Ferrand
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU Lapeyronie
🇫🇷Montpellier Cedex 05, France
Centre Hélio Marin
🇫🇷Vallauris, France