MedPath

Effectiveness of an Oxygen-nitrous Oxide Mixture During Physical Therapy for Frozen Shoulder

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Adhesive Capsulitis
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Drug: equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture
Registration Number
NCT01087229
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the use of an equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide during the physical therapy for patients suffering from frozen shoulder (adhesive shoulder capsulitis) results in a gain in shoulder amplitude (Constant Score) and less pain as compared to patients undergoing physical therapy without this treatment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
75
Inclusion Criteria
  • Affiliated with a social security system
  • Has signed the consent form
  • Patient has a painful, or initially painful but stable frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis): stiffening characterized by a passive loss of amplitude on three planes. This loss of amplitude is greater than or equal to 50% of controlateral amplitude when the controlateral shoulder is considered as normal. Otherwise, the loss of amplitude is greater than or equal to 50% of normal anatomical values.
  • Radiography confirms the integrity of the glenohumeral interspace.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Intercurrent, evolving or unstable pathology: cancer, advanced cardio-vascular pathology, severe infection
  • The patient is taking a treatment that may interfere with the study (eg corticoids, pain killers, chemotherapy)
  • Contra-indication for physical therapy
  • Coagulopathy
  • Advanced diabetes mellitus, with neurological or joint complications
  • Contra indication for the experimental treatment
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Patient's mental state prevents him/her from understanding the nature of the study, its objectives and potential consequences.
  • Patient under guardianship
  • Patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • Patient not able to follow protocol constraints or timetable
  • Medical history of local infection, polyarthritis or neuropathy that might explain the shoulder pain.
  • Absence of radiculopathy of cervical origin, of rotator cuff tears or evolving shoulder tendinopathy, of severe omarthrose

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlaceboPatients randomized to this arm will have the placebo.
equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixtureequimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixtureequimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture Kinesitherapy is performed with a mask by which patient inhales an equimolar oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in the Constant Score using treatment as compared to without treatment.fifteen days of physical therapy
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global abduction of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global anterior flexion of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global lateral flexion of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global external rotation (ER2) of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Functional improvementDay 180

Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH)

Pain at visitsAt each session: final session on Day 15

0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS)

Pain induced during sessionsAt each session: final session on Day 15

0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS)

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global lateral flexion of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral flexion of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral abduction of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global external rotation (ER2) of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global internal rotation of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive glenohumeral external rotation (ER1) of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of active global anterior flexion of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

patient satisfactionAt each session: final session on Day 15

0-10 VAS: 10=session interrupted due to pain; 0= session completed under perfect conditions

Change in kinetics at final session since baseline of passive global abduction of the shoulderFinal session on Day 15

Range of motion in degrees

Change in the Constant Score using treatment as compared to without treatmentDay 180
Patient Quality of lifeDay 180

MOS-SF36 score

Antalgic intakeUntil end of study (Day 180)

Discriptively noted

Limitations posed to the physiotherapist activity due to patient pain at each sessionAt each session: final session on Day 15

Likert six-point scale (none, to extremely high)

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Unité Rééducation Réadaptation Locomotrice

🇫🇷

Le Grau du Roi, Gard, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

🇫🇷

Nîmes, Gard, France

CHU de Clermont Ferrand

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

CHU Lapeyronie

🇫🇷

Montpellier Cedex 05, France

Centre Hélio Marin

🇫🇷

Vallauris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath