MedPath

EXPLORE DMR: Early Feasibility Study of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to Treat Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
Interventions
Device: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)
Registration Number
NCT04679662
Lead Sponsor
Polares Medical SA
Brief Summary

An early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and to gather preliminary data on its performance thereby providing guidance for future clinical development. The study is a single-arm registry with the last follow-up visit at 5 years post-intervention. The study will enroll up to 10 patients at one (1) center in Brazil.

Detailed Description

Percutaneous approaches to treat MR promise to provide a sufficient reduction in MR without the risks typically associated with open heart surgery. Furthermore there is an unmet clinical need for patients with severe MR who are refused or denied surgery due to high risk. Percutaneous therapy provides a novel alternative treatment option for these patients with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality over and above current medical therapy. The Polares Medical PLAR Implant and Delivery System is a catheter-based technology designed to permanently implant a prosthesis using a transvenous / transseptal approach to augment the posterior mitral valve leaflet and improve coaptation with the anterior leaflet. Approved edge-to-edge repair has already been shown to be a viable alternative for high risk MR patients. However treatment with these devices is limited to specific anatomies and often requires multiple devices which increases clinical risk, adds to procedural time, and can result in residual MR. The PLAR Implant and Delivery System has been designed to overcome and mitigate some of these shortfalls.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Greater than moderate degenerative mitral regurgitation (Grade 3+ or higher) as confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 90 days prior to study procedure
  3. Patient must present with an STS Score less than 10%
  4. High surgical risk for conventional mitral repair or replacement due to morphological criteria (e.g. leaflet or annulus calcifications), but operable, as assessed by the local heart team comprised of a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in treating mitral valve disease and heart failure
  5. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
  6. Patient willing to participate in study and provide signed IRB/EC-approved informed consent
  7. Treating physician and patient agree that patient is able to return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Severe tricuspid regurgitation
  2. Severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency
  3. Severe mitral annulus calcification
  4. Diseased mitral anterior leaflet such as flail / prolapse/ heavy calcification
  5. Implanted vena cava filter
  6. Femoral veins with severe angulation and calcification
  7. Contraindication for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or MDCT scan
  8. Active infection or endocarditis
  9. Previous mitral valve surgery
  10. Prior orthotopic heart transplantation
  11. Pulmonary artery systolic hypertension > 70mmHg
  12. Evidence of intra-cardiac, inferior vena cava (IVC) or femoral venous thrombus
  13. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30%
  14. Implant or revision of any pacing device < 30 days prior to intervention
  15. Symptomatic coronary artery disease treated < 30 days prior to study procedure
  16. Myocardial infarction requiring intervention < 30 days prior to study procedure
  17. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis), hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathies, and constrictive pericarditis
  18. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding < 90 days prior to study procedure
  19. Stroke < 180 days prior to study procedure
  20. Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) or patient requiring dialysis
  21. Cardiogenic shock at time of enrolment
  22. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance
  23. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  24. Pregnancy at time of enrolment
  25. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or leukopenia (WBC < 3,000 mcL) or acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000 cells mcL)
  26. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, nitinol, tantalum or allergy to contrast agents that cannot be pre-medicated
  27. Severe dementia or lack of capacity due to conditions that result in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevent independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up assessments
  28. Emergency situations
  29. Company employees or their immediate family members
  30. Patient is under guardianship
  31. Patient is participating in another clinical study for which follow-up is currently ongoing

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Single-arm study of PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe mitral regurgitationTranscatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)All enrolled patients will receive the study device
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of change from severe mitral regurgitation at baseline (Grade 3+ or more) to moderate or less mitral regurgitation (Grade 2+ or less) following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System as evaluated by 2D TTE30-days follow-up

Primary performance endpoint

Incidence of all-cause mortality following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System30-days follow-up

Primary safety outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of major safety events as defined by MVARC2 definitionsFollow-up at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

Secondary safety endpoint

Device success rate per MVARC 2 definitionsDevice success is measured at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years follow-up

All of the following must be present for device success:

* Absence of procedure mortality or stroke

* Proper placement and positioning of device

* Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure

* Continued intended safety and performance of the device as below:

* No evidence of structural or functional failure

* No device technical failure issues/complications

* MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis

Patient success rate per MVARC2 definitionsPatient success is measured at 12 months follow-up

All of the following must be present for patient success:

* Device success

* Patient returned to pre-procedure setting

* No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure • Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class

* 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more

Technical success rate per MVARC2 definitionsTechnical success is measured immediately following the procedure

All of the following must be present for technical success:

* Absence of procedure mortality

* Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system

* Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s)

* Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure

Procedure success rate per MVARC2 definitionsProcedure success is measured at 30 days follow-up

Both of the following must be present for procedure success:

* Device success

* Absence of major device or procedure-related serious adverse events as below:

* Death

* Stroke

* Life-threatening bleed

* Major vascular complication

* Major cardiac structural complication

* Stage 2 or 3 AKI

* MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG

* Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation

* Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath