IOTA Versus Pattern Recognition Method in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Gynecology

• Registration Number: NCT02800031
• Lead Sponsor: Woman's Health University Hospital, Egypt

Brief Summary

To compare between the efficacy of IOTA simple rules and pattern recognition method in the differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-04
• Study First Submitted: 2016-04-26
• Study First Submitted QC: 2016-06-11
• Study First Posted: 2016-06-15
• Primary Completion: 2018-11
• Study Completion: 2018-11
• Status Verified: 2019-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-01-06
• Last Update Posted: 2019-01-08

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 396

Inclusion Criteria

• Ovarian mass more than 5 cm in size (confirmed by transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasonography in gynecology clinic)
• The patient is candidate for abdominal exploration for ovarian Cystectomy or oophorectomy.

Exclusion Criteria

• Complicated ovarian masses.
• Unfit for surgery.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SEQUENTIAL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
comparing the sensitivity of the IOTA versus the Pattern recognition in diagnosing the different types of ovarian masses	12 month

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kasr el aini hospital; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt