Efficacy Study of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon, -Stent vs. Plain Angioplasty for Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis
- Conditions
- Heart DiseaseIschemiaRestenosis
- Interventions
- Device: Taxus stentDevice: Conventional Balloon CatheterDevice: SeQuent Please
- Registration Number
- NCT00987324
- Lead Sponsor
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized study is to determine which treatment option, either paclitaxel-eluting balloon, paclitaxel-eluting stent or plain balloon angioplasty is the most effective in the treatment of restenosis after implantation of "Limus"-eluting stents, (LES).
- Detailed Description
The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has led to a drastic reduction of restenosis rates compared to bare metal stents (BMS), but 5% to 10% of patients receiving DES are still in need of revascularization of the treated vessel. Two important families of drugs are used for stent coating: paclitaxel belonging to the taxane family, and the "limus"-family such as sirolimus, everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus A9 and pimecrolimus.
Data regarding the optimal treatment of in-DES-restenosis is very limited. Implanting a new DES for in-DES-restenosis has been reported to be associated with re-restenosis rates as high as 43%. Several recent well published studies have shown a substantial reduction of restenosis using paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB) for de-novo lesions and BMS-restenotic lesions.
The objective of this randomized trial is to assess the hypothesis, that PEB are non-inferior to paclitaxel-eluting-stents (PES) for restenosis in "limus"-eluting-stents (LES), and both, PEB and PES, are superior to plain angioplasty in patients with restenosis after initial LES implantation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 402
- Patients with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥ 50% restenosis after prior implantation of LES in native coronary vessels.
- Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
- In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.
- Age < 18 years.
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 48 hours from symptom onset.
- Target lesion located in the left main trunk or bypass graft.
- Target lesion located in small vessel (vessel size < 2.0 mm).
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 ml/min).
- Contraindications to antiplatelet therapy, paclitaxel, stainless steel, cobalt, chrome.
- Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
- Previous enrollment in this trial.
- Patient's inability to fully comply with the study protocol.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Paclitaxel-eluting stent Taxus stent Paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus) Plain Balloon Conventional Balloon Catheter plain balloon angioplasty Paclitaxel-eluting balloon SeQuent Please SeQuent Please
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent in-segment diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography 6-8 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method In-segment binary angiographic restenosis 6-8 months Incidence of thrombosis 1 and 2 years In-segment minimal luminal diameter 6-8 months Combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction 1 and 2 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Herz-Zentrum
🇩🇪Bad Krozingen, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum
🇩🇪Munich, Germany
1. Med. Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
🇩🇪Munich, Bavaria, Germany