Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00241449
NCT00241449
Completed
Phase 3

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicentre Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of 250mg of Faslodex (Long Acting ICI 182,780) With 20mg of Nolvadex (Tamoxifen) in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer

AstraZeneca1 site in 1 country51 target enrollmentNovember 1998

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Tamoxifen
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Enrollment
51
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to disease progression (TTP)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Faslodex (fulvestrant) to Nolvadex (tamoxifen) as first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Patients will be treated until disease progression or until the investigator has determined that treatment is not in the best interest of the patient, whichever occurs first.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 1998
End Date
January 2012
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Biopsy confirmation of breast cancer. Evidence of breast cancer that is not considered amenable to curative treatment.
  • Postmenopausal women. Written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous treatment with hormonal therapy unless that therapy was tamoxifen for adjuvant breast cancer. The use of tamoxifen must have ceased at least one year before this study.
  • Previous treatment with Faslodex. Any existing serious disease, illness, or condition that will prevent participation or compliance with the study procedures.
  • Treatment with an investigational or non-approved drug within one month of then start of the study.

Arms & Interventions

1

Tamoxifen

Intervention: Tamoxifen

2

Fulvestrant

Intervention: Fulvestrant

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to disease progression (TTP)

Time Frame: At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.

It is considered that these results indicate that adequate data were available for obtaining clinically meaningful information for the primary efficacy endpoint of time to disease progression

Secondary Outcomes

  • Objective response rate (ORR)(At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.)
  • Duration of response (DoR)(At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.)
  • Time to treatment failure (TTF)(At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.)
  • Overall survival (OS)(At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.)
  • Quality of Life (QOL) and Tolerability.(At the time of data cut-off for this trial, the median overall duration of follow-up was 441 days, with a total of 434 (73.9%) randomised patients, including 47 patients from Japanese centres having progressed.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials