Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2022/02/039915
CTRI/2022/02/039915
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A

A comparative evaluation of prosthetic and biological outcome as influenced by two different implant restorative materials (porcelain fused to metal and monolithic zirconia) - A prospective, cross arch study

Taniya Malhotra0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: K055- Other periodontal diseases
Sponsor
Taniya Malhotra
Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Taniya Malhotra

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Two implants placed in the same arch in posterior quadrant requiring prosthodontic rehabilitation.
  • 2\.Interocclusal restorative space of 8\-10 mm
  • 3\.Healthy Periodontium with no visible signs of bruxism
  • 4\.Stable and healthy implants with no crestal bone loss

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1\. According to ASA Classification Class 4 patients:
  • Organic heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency
  • Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration.
  • Unstable angina.
  • Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency
  • 2\. According to ASA Classification Class 3 patients
  • Diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs, i.e., retinopathy, neuropathy, etc.
  • 3\. Occlusal anomalies
  • 4\. Long term edentulism leading to mesial drifting of adjacent teeth or supraaeruption of opposing teeth
  • 5\.Para\-functional Habits (Bruxism)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials