Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of AF in Heart Failure
- Conditions
- Atrial FibrillationHeart Failure
- Interventions
- Procedure: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillationDrug: Medical treatment alone
- Registration Number
- NCT01411371
- Lead Sponsor
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Brief Summary
Heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, and each increases the morbidity and mortality associated with the other. The investigators hypothesized that restoration of normal sinus rhythm by catheter ablation is superior to medical treatment of AF in heart failure. This study randomizes patients with heart failure and persistent AF to medical treatment of AF or catheter ablation to restore sinus rhythm.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Persistent atrial fibrillation
- Symptomatic heart failure
- Reversible causes of heart failure
- Contraindications to catheter ablation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Catheter Ablation Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation to restore normal sinus rhythm. Medical treatment alone Medical treatment alone Patients are randomised to medical treatment alone for atrial fibrillation. Treatment will be as per current guidelines for persistent atrial fibrillation, with rate control as first line (using beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and digoxin as indicated) and rhythm control as second line (using sotalol, dronedarone, or amiodarone as indicated). (Both groups will receive standard heart failure medication including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and diuretics as indicated).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in ejection fraction between groups 6 months Difference in left ventricular ejection fraction between groups on echocardiography at 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in peak VO2 between groups 6 months Difference in NYHA class between groups 6 months Difference in BNP between groups 6 months Difference in Quality of Life between groups 6 months Using SF36 and Minnessota questionaire
Reduction in end systolic volume 6 months compared to baseline Comparisson between groups of the percentage reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume at 6 months compared to baseline.
Difference in heart failure symptoms 6 months Comparisson between groups in heart failure symptoms using the Minessota living with heart failure questionaire.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Barts & The London NHS Trust
🇬🇧London, UK, United Kingdom