MedPath

Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of AF in Heart Failure

Not Applicable
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Heart Failure
Interventions
Procedure: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation
Drug: Medical treatment alone
Registration Number
NCT01411371
Lead Sponsor
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Brief Summary

Heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, and each increases the morbidity and mortality associated with the other. The investigators hypothesized that restoration of normal sinus rhythm by catheter ablation is superior to medical treatment of AF in heart failure. This study randomizes patients with heart failure and persistent AF to medical treatment of AF or catheter ablation to restore sinus rhythm.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Symptomatic heart failure
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Reversible causes of heart failure
  • Contraindications to catheter ablation
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Catheter AblationCatheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillationCatheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation to restore normal sinus rhythm.
Medical treatment aloneMedical treatment alonePatients are randomised to medical treatment alone for atrial fibrillation. Treatment will be as per current guidelines for persistent atrial fibrillation, with rate control as first line (using beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and digoxin as indicated) and rhythm control as second line (using sotalol, dronedarone, or amiodarone as indicated). (Both groups will receive standard heart failure medication including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and diuretics as indicated).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in ejection fraction between groups6 months

Difference in left ventricular ejection fraction between groups on echocardiography at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in peak VO2 between groups6 months
Difference in NYHA class between groups6 months
Difference in BNP between groups6 months
Difference in Quality of Life between groups6 months

Using SF36 and Minnessota questionaire

Reduction in end systolic volume6 months compared to baseline

Comparisson between groups of the percentage reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume at 6 months compared to baseline.

Difference in heart failure symptoms6 months

Comparisson between groups in heart failure symptoms using the Minessota living with heart failure questionaire.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Barts & The London NHS Trust

🇬🇧

London, UK, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath