Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
- Conditions
- Substance UseAdolescent DevelopmentChild NeglectRisk BehaviorDelinquencyMental Health ImpairmentEducational ProblemsAdolescent BehaviorChild AbuseSexual Behavior
- Interventions
- Behavioral: FHF-T
- Registration Number
- NCT03707366
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Denver
- Brief Summary
This study will implement and evaluate a mentoring program designed to promote positive youth development and reduce adverse outcomes among maltreated adolescents with open child welfare cases. Teenagers who have been maltreated are at heightened risk for involvement in delinquency, substance use, and educational failure as a result of disrupted attachments with caregivers and exposure to violence within their homes and communities. Although youth mentoring is a widely used prevention approach nationally, it has not been rigorously studied for its effects in preventing these adverse outcomes among maltreated youth involved in the child welfare system. This randomized controlled trial will permit us to implement and evaluate the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens (FHF-T) program, which will use mentoring and skills training within an innovative positive youth development (PYD) framework to promote adaptive functioning and prevent adverse outcomes. Graduate student mentors will deliver 9 months of prevention programming in teenagers' homes and communities. Mentors will focus on helping youth set and reach goals that will improve their functioning in five targeted "REACH" domains: Relationships, Education, Activities, Career, and Health. In reaching those goals, mentors will help youth build social-emotional skills associated with preventing adverse outcomes (e.g., emotion regulation, communication, problem solving). The randomized controlled trial will enroll 234 racially and ethnically diverse 8th and 9th grade youth (117 intervention, 117 control), who will provide data at baseline prior to randomization, immediately post-program and 15 months post program follow-up. The aims of the study include testing the efficacy of FHF-T for high-risk 8th and 9th graders in preventing adverse outcomes and examining whether better functioning in positive youth development domains mediates intervention effects. It is hypothesized that youth randomly assigned to the FHF-T prevention condition, relative to youth assigned to the control condition, will evidence better functioning on indices of positive youth development in the REACH domains leading to better long-term outcomes, including adaptive functioning, high school graduation, career attainment/employment, healthy relationships, and quality of life.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 234
- Teens with open child welfare cases placed in foster care, kinship care or living at home
- Starting 8th or 9th grade
- History of child maltreatment according to child welfare and court records
- Live within 35 minutes of the University of Denver (for mentoring feasibility)
- Youth with a known history of severe violent behavior and/or sexual perpetration
- Youth who are deemed unsafe or unable to participate in a community-based mentoring program by their caseworker
- Incarcerated at baseline
- Moderate or severe developmental delay or physical disability
- Youth who are/will be parenting during the prevention program
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description FHF-T Intervention Group FHF-T 9 months of 1:1 youth mentoring by graduate-student mentors; workshops; educational advocacy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Court filings for delinquency immediately post intervention immediately post-intervention (T2) Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Passing grades 15 months-post intervention 15-months-post intervention (T3) Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure
Self-reported delinquency immediately post intervention immediately post-intervention (T2) The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
Court filings for delinquency 15 months-post intervention 15-months-post intervention (T3) Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior
Self-reported delinquency 15 months-post intervention 15-months-post intervention (T3) The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency
Substance use 15 months-post intervention 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
School suspensions immediately post intervention immediately post-intervention (T2) Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
School suspensions 15 months-post intervention 15-months-post intervention (T3) Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Passing grades immediately post intervention immediately post-intervention (T2) Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure
Substance use immediately post intervention immediately post-intervention (T2) Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Life Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported mean quality of life as measured by the Life Satisfaction Scale (Andrews \& Withey, 1976)
Internalizing symptoms Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported internalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the internalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Connectedness to school Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported school connection will be measured by the mean score on the Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale (Goodenow, 1993) which assesses attachment and emotional response to a school environment.
Academic achievement Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Academic Achievement will be assessed using standard scores on The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Screener (WIAT Screener; Psychological Corporation, 1992).
Externalizing symptoms Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported externalizing symptoms will be assessed using the mean score on the externalizing subscale of The Youth Self Report (YSR; Achenbach, 2001).
Conflict management skills Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported conflict management skills will be measured using the mean score on the conflict management subscale of the Safe Dates Evaluation Questionnaire (Foshee, Bauman, Bennett, Suchindran, Benefield, \& Linder, 2005).
Extracurricular activity involvement Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported number and frequency of extracurricular activity involvement will be measured by The Activities Scale, a project-designed measure.
Perceived Opportunities Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported perceived opportunities will be assessed using mean scores on the Perceived Opportunities scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Dating violence Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported dating violence will be measured by The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI; Wolfe, Scott, Wekerle, \& Pittman, 2001).
Trauma symptoms Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported trauma symptoms will be assessed using mean total and subscale scores of the Trauma Symptom Checklist (TSC; Briere, 1996).
Coping skills Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported coping skills will be measured using the mean scores on the subscales of the Children's Coping Strategies Checklist (Program for Prevention Research, 1999).
Self-efficacy Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported self-efficacy will be measured by the mean score on the Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (Cowen, Work, Hightower, Wyman, Parker, \& Ltyczewski, 1991).
Help seeking behaviors Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported help seeking will be measured by the number of identified social network members from whom the youth seek help and the frequency of seeking help on The Help Seeking Behaviors Scale (Pham, Y. K., McWhirter, E. H., \& Murray, C., 2014).
Resiliency Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-reported resiliency will be measured using standardized scores on The Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents (RSCA; Prince-Embury, 2006, 2007).
Use of protection while having sex Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3) Self-report of using protection while having sex, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Denver
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States