跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06476977
NCT06476977招募中不适用

Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection Pain: Palmar Injection Versus Dorsal Intrasynovial (Transthecal) Injection

Kevin Zuo1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年7月3日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ) - Present Pain Intensity (PPI)

研究概览

简要总结

Trigger finger is a common disease of the hand involving swelling and inflammation of the tendon which flexes a finger, causing catching, locking, and/or pain. Trigger finger is typically treated by hand surgeons with a steroid injection through the front/palm side of the hand into the area near the tendon (i.e., at the base of the affected finger). This steroid injection is often combined with a local anesthetic (numbing agent) to help reduce short-term pain from the injection. However, the front/palm side of the hand is known to be very sensitive, and the steroid injection can be quite painful as the needle pierces the front/palm skin.

To reduce the pain of steroid injections for trigger finger, a different approach involves performing the injection from the back/dorsal side of the hand, which is thought to be less sensitive (and therefore less painful) than the front/palm side of the hand. This technique is sometimes used and has been previously studied, but it is not clear if it can offer less injection-related pain than standard treatment.

Accordingly, this study will be comparing short-term injection-associated pain between front/palm side and back/dorsal side steroid injections for trigger finger. The study will also seek to understand what area of the hand is numbed by the anesthetic when doing a front/palm side injection versus a back/dorsal side injection of the hand. Overall, the investigators hypothesize that back/dorsal side injections will be less painful than front/palm side injections for trigger fingers and that the area of numbing from the anesthetic will be equivalent between both types of injections.

详细描述

Trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis) is one of the most common pathologies assessed by hand surgeons in clinic. Trigger finger involves inflammation or edema of the flexor tendon causing friction of the tendon at the site of the A1 annular pulley located at the base of the affected finger in the palm. Trigger finger is typically managed non-surgically in a clinic setting with percutaneous corticosteroid injection (CSI) which can be successful in alleviating symptoms. Patients with trigger finger who do not respond to CSI, have incomplete relief, and/or who have recurrent symptoms may then receive surgical management with release of the A1 pulley.

CSIs for trigger fingers are among the most common procedures performed by hand surgeons and are often administered multiple times in a single clinic day. CSIs are frequently mixed 50:50 with 1% lidocaine to provide post-injection analgesia for patients as well as symptomatic relief of the trigger finger if acutely inflamed. These injections are commonly administered from a palmar approach into the A1 pulley of the affected digit. Numerous technical variations of palmar trigger finger injections have been described involving either subcutaneous injection superficial to the flexor tendon sheath or intrasynovial (transthecal) injection into the flexor tendon sheath.

Unfortunately, given the rich sensory innervation of the palmar skin, palmar injections are associated with significant pain as the needle pierces the skin. An alternative technique is to provide digital anesthesia from a dorsal webspace approach, injecting the local anesthetic into the flexor tendon synovial sheath. This intrasynovial or transthecal technique has the benefit of a dorsal approach where the skin is less sensitive resulting in less pain (6). This technique has been described previously but is not familiar to many hand surgeons and is not routinely used in North America.

Anecdotally, patients report significantly decreased pain with the dorsal intrasynovial injection technique for trigger finger injections, but pain scores have not been quantitatively evaluated or compared to the pain scores of traditional palmar trigger finger injections. Furthermore, it is not known what distribution of digital sensory blockade is achieved with this intrasynovial technique, particularly on the dorsal surface of the digit which is discontinuous with the flexor tendon sheath and innervated by the sensory branch of the radial nerve.

Accordingly, it is hypothesized that injecting corticosteroids into the synovial sheath of the flexor tendon will result in less pain over 24 hours if performed through the dorsal webspace versus the palmar side of the affected digit.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Be 18 years of age or older
  • •Have a diagnosis of trigger finger (can be any of the 5 digits)
  • •Opting to receive a CSI for their triggering finger

排除标准

  • •Decline to obtain a CSI for trigger finger management
  • •Receiving multiple CSI for trigger finger management at the appointment
  • •Past CSI and/or surgery to the digit involved
  • •Unable to communicate in English

研究组 & 干预措施

Dorsal Webspace Approach

Experimental

A dorsal approach involves passing the needle with a 1:1 triamcinolone and lidocaine mixture in the dorsal webspace skin aiming just palmar to the proximal phalanx bone such that the needle is directed into the flexor tendon sheath at the A1 annular pulley.

干预措施: Dorsal webspace combined corticosteroid and anesthetic injection (Procedure)

Palmar Approach

Active Comparator

Standard approach for injecting the 1:1 triamcinolone and lidocaine mixture involves the needle passing through the cutaneous and subcutaneous layers of the palmar skin surface and into the flexor tendon sheath at the A1 annular pulley.

干预措施: Palmar combined corticosteroid and anesthetic injection (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ) - Present Pain Intensity (PPI)

时间窗: measured at 0 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours post-injection

5-point combined numerical-word rating scale for pain, ranging from 1 (mild) to 5 (excruciating); higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - Pain

时间窗: measured at 0 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours post-injection

100mm mechanical rating scale for pain, ranging from 0mm ("no pain") to 100mm ("pain as bad as it could be"); higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - Pain

时间窗: measured at 0 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours post-injection

11-point numerical rating scale for pain, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever possible); higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

次要结局

  • Sensory Assessment - Pain(measured at 0 hours post-injection)
  • Sensory Assessment - Light Touch(measured at 0 hours post-injection)

研究者

发起方
Kevin Zuo
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Kevin Zuo

Staff Surgeon, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

University Health Network, Toronto

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验