Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Soft & Hard Tissue Healing Around UV Activated vs Conventional Implants

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: UV Dental Implant
• Interventions: Procedure: conventional implant; Procedure: UV implant

• Registration Number: NCT06541912
• Lead Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

Brief Summary

Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants.

Detailed Description

Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants. The objectives are to access the primary and secondary implant stability using Resonance frequency analysis, marginal bone level using RVG with grid, healing of the soft tissue. The control group will be treated with conventional implant and test group will be treated with UV implants. The total number of participants are 12 and 24 sites (control - 12 sites, test - 12 sites) with 3 months follow up.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-02-15
• Study First Submitted: 2024-07-19
• Status Verified: 2024-08
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-08-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-08-02
• Study First Posted: 2024-08-07
• Last Update Posted: 2024-08-07
• Primary Completion: 2026-03-25
• Study Completion: 2026-03-25

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 12

Inclusion Criteria

• At east above 18 years of age
• Patients who needs replacement for at least 2 missing teeth in the posterior region of mandible
• Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants
• Patients who will comply with oral health care instructions and necessary visits

Exclusion Criteria

• General contraindications to dental implant treatment ( uncontrolled diabetes, severe cardiovascular or infectious disease)
• Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy
• Unwillingness to return for the follow up examinations
• Smokers
• Patients who are psychologically unable to participate
• Poor oral hygiene

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
conventional dental implant group	conventional implant	conventional dental implant placement will act as control group.
UV dental implant group	UV implant	UV activated implant placement will act as test group which has better osseointegration properties.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Implant stability using Resonance Frequency Analysis	"Immediately after Post-operative", "1 month", "3 months"	to measure primary and secondary stability

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Marginal bone loss using RVG with grid	"Immediately after Post-operative", 3 months	to measure marginal bone level
Soft tissue healing	1 week, 1 month, 3 months.	soft tissue healing to be assessed using Landry Turnbull and Howley Healing Index. Soft tissue healing will be scored from 1 to 5, where score 1 is very poor and 5 is excellent.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dr. Prabhuji MLV; 🇮🇳 Bengaluru, Karnataka, India