跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06686264
NCT06686264已完成不适用

Effects of Core Stability Exercises on Motor Control in Patients With Low Back Pain.

Riphah International University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2024年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
44
试验地点
1
主要终点
MCI tests

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this research is aims to evaluate the effectiveness of core stability exercise on motor control, pain and disability in patients with low back pain.

Randomized controlled trials will be done at Rehman Medical Institute. The sample size was 44. The subjects were divided in two groups, 22 subjects were given conventional therapy and 22 were given conventional therapy along with core stability exercises. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique. Patient with age 30-50 years both Male & female gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks, MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture) with 3 or more positive tests were included. Tools used in the study are NPRS, ODI, and MCI tests.

详细描述

: Low back pain is a major health and socioeconomic problem and is associated with high costs in care, work absenteeism, and disability worldwide. According to evidence-based guidelines up to 90% of all Low Back Pain is classified as non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).Low back pain affects most people at some point in their lives, with up to an 84% lifetime prevalence and the prevalence depends on factors such as gender, age, educational level and occupation.

The underlying hypothesis is that impaired motor control (MC) and a lack of awareness of maladaptive movement patterns perpetuate Low Back Pain. Physiotherapists make clinical decisions based on the observation of movement control. O'Sullivan describes back pain patients with reduced Motor Control and excessive movement as pain provocateurs. Movement impairment syndromes and the detection of disordered movement, or pathokinesiology, is a key competence of physiotherapy. Pathokinesiologic movement patterns in the lumbar spine have been investigated and described, resulting in the publication of both reliability and validation studies of the examination procedures used. However, no clear evidence exists as to whether improvement in movement control can also lead to decreased pain and experienced daily disability in patients with NSLBP. Patients with Motor Control Impairment MCI present with mechanically induced pain in static postures together with visible movement abnormalities, such as decreased or increased movement of parts of the lumbar spine, or discrepancies in the proportion of hip, leg and spine movements. It is assumed that these movement abnormalities are influenced by current pain, previous pain episodes and the belief that pain provoked by movement is harmful. Patients exhibiting Motor Control Impairment demonstrate clinical features that can be screened with the aid of various clinical tests. Based on this principle, treatment aimed at restoring movement control, correcting movement patterns and avoiding pain-provoking postures could benefit patients with MCI.

The European Guidelines for Management of Chronic Non-Specific LBP recommend supervised exercise therapy as a first-line treatment for chronic Low Back Pain LBP. Exercise is the main treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP) which is endorsed in most clinical practice guidelines. There is controversy over the most beneficial exercise, and there is little evidence that a particular kind of exercise is superior to another one.

In literature, there are studies which have been carried out for the effectiveness of exercises based on specific movement control findings in the low back, formed the justification for current study to evaluate core stability exercises in a subgroup of patients with non-specific LBP and impaired movement control or Motor control Impairment. Widely used synonyms for movement impairment syndromes are motor control dysfunctions and MC impairment. A study in Switzerland was carried out to observe improvement in Motor Control, decreased pain and disability in patients with NSLBP pain. The biggest effect was shown in the improvement of movement control ability following specific exercise intervention. A significant difference between patients with LBP and subjects without back pain regarding their ability to actively control the movements of the low back has been demonstrated in a study. One study was carried out to see the effects of movement control exercises versus general exercises on the disability and pain to patients with NSLBP and MCI but they both appeared equally effective in the patient subgroup included in this study After reviewing existing literature, it is notable that core stability exercises and other specific exercises have been frequently employed in studies focusing on the treatment of non-specific low back pain, yielding promising results in reducing pain and disability among patients. It is from evidence that patients with NSLBP exhibit Motor Control Impairments. Dysfunction or weakness in the core musculature can disrupt this balance, leading to altered movement patterns and impaired motor control. However, a significant gap persists in the literature regarding the investigation of the effects of core stability exercises on motor control impairment. While core stability exercises have demonstrated efficacy in addressing pain and disability outcomes, their specific impact on motor control impairment in patients with low back pain remains underexplored. This gap underscores the need for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of core stability exercises on motor control in this patient population.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Both gender Presence of back pain for ≥6 weeks
  • •Age 30 -50 years
  • •MCI (Motor Control Impairment) complaints (pain provocation in static posture)
  • •Participants had 3 or more positive test out of six MCI tests.

排除标准

  • •LBP of specific cause, Recent spine surgery (<6 weeks)
  • •Comorbid health condition(Spondylolesthesis, fracture, Spondylolysis)
  • •Constant pain below knee
  • •Patient who denied consent

研究组 & 干预措施

Core stability Group A

Experimental

the core stability group includes core stability exercises along with the general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches

干预措施: core stability group A (Other)

Traditional therapy group B

Active Comparator

the traditional group includes general back, pelvis and piriformis stretches

干预措施: traditional exercises group B (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

MCI tests

时间窗: baseline to 6 weeks

First test is Waiters Bow test which includes flexion of hip 50-70⁰ in upright standing without movement (flexion) of low back. The second test is dorsal pelvic tilt in upright standing keeping thoracic spine neutral and lumbar spine moves towards flexion. The third tests involves normal standing to single leg stance and measurement of lateral movement of belly. Fourth test is upright sitting with knee extension. In this position lumbar spine should be neutral. Fifth test is quadruped position with pelvis moving back and fro i.e. rocking with low back in neutral. Hip should be flex 90-120⁰. The last test is prone lying with active knee flexion up to 90⁰ without movement of low back and pelvis. If 3 out 6 tests are positive then subject will be categorized as impaired motor control.

次要结局

  • NPRS(baseline to 6 weeks)
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI(baseline to 6 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验