Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2022/07/043728
CTRI/2022/07/043728
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3

Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of LMA Blockbuster after blind insertion versus under vision of Miller laryngoscope guided insertion in paediatric patients undergoing General Anaesthesia.

Dr S N Medical College Jodhpur0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Dr S N Medical College Jodhpur
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
3 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr S N Medical College Jodhpur

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with American Society of Anaesthesiology Physical status I or II of either sex, aged between 1 year and 4 years and weight between 7 kg to 20 kg with Mallampatti grade (MPG) Class 1 and class 2 and undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia in supine position will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\) Refusal of parental consent.
  • •2\) Patients undergoing emergency surgery.
  • •3\) Patients with increased risk of aspiration.
  • •4\) Patients with abnormal or distorted anatomy of the pharynx, limited mouth opening.
  • •5\) Patients with obstruction of the airway beyond the larynx like foreign body, masses(cancer), strictures, congenital obstruction, vocal cord scarring, inflammatory conditions like laryngitis, bronchitis, laryngeal pappilomatosis etc.
  • •6\) Patients with decreased compliance of lungs like asthma, pneumonitis etc.
  • •7\) History of prematurity, seizures, syndromic babies and congenital heart disease
  • •8\) History of recent upper respiratory tract infection
  • •9\) Children with reported allergy to silicon material.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the effect of Proposed Novel Technique against Bur Technique for non-carious cervical lesions of teeth on eighteen months clinical performance of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite restoration along with its bite force.
CTRI/2024/04/065670Dr Rajiv Khode
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
comparison between 3D printed space maintainer and prefabricated stainless steel space maintainerHealth Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth
CTRI/2023/10/058547JAHANA SHERIN IM
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Clinical survival of root canal treated teeth restored with reinforced composite restoration.
CTRI/2018/05/014019Self
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Performance of Two Different 3D Printed Definitive Resin Dental Crowns with Pressed Lithium Disilicate Dental Crowns in PatientsHealth Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth
CTRI/2023/06/054161Dr Jyot Kaur Kohli
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative Evaluation of Resin Modified GIC and Universal injectable composite in noncarious cervical lesions.Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth
CTRI/2021/05/033797Dr Akshay Punjabi