Multifocal Lens Design Evaluation
- Conditions
- Refractive ErrorPresbyopia
- Interventions
- Device: Delefilcon A multifocal contact lensDevice: Lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lens
- Registration Number
- NCT01997216
- Lead Sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare binocular high contrast, high illumination (HC/HI) visual acuity at near (40 centimeters) of new multifocal contact lenses against AIR OPTIX® AQUA MULTIFOCAL contact lenses when worn for 9 hours.
- Detailed Description
Each participant was randomized to a specific sequence of lens wear, during which each lens type was worn bilaterally for 9 hours to compare performance characteristics.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 42
- Sign written Informed Consent document.
- Have spectacles that provide acceptable vision and be willing to wear them if unable to wear the study lenses.
- Be presbyopic with a spectacle add ≥ 0.50 diopter.
- Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days a week.
- Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply
- Eye injury or surgery within 12 weeks of enrollment in this trial.
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
- Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
- Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection, or disease which is likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses (for at least 9 hours) or use of their accessory solutions as determined by the Investigator.
- Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated as determined by the Investigator.
- Binocular visual acuity worse than 20/25.
- Corrected by monovision.
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Delefilcon A MF, then AOAMF Delefilcon A multifocal contact lens Delefilcon A multifocal contact lenses, followed by lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lenses, as randomized. Each product was worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 9 hours. The wear periods were separated by 2 ± 1 days. Delefilcon A MF, then AOAMF Lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lens Delefilcon A multifocal contact lenses, followed by lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lenses, as randomized. Each product was worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 9 hours. The wear periods were separated by 2 ± 1 days. AOAMF, then Delefilcon A MF Delefilcon A multifocal contact lens Lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lenses, followed by delefilcon A multifocal contact lenses, as randomized. Each product was worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 9 hours. The wear periods were separated by 2 ± 1 days. AOAMF, then Delefilcon A MF Lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lens Lotrafilcon B multifocal contact lenses, followed by delefilcon A multifocal contact lenses, as randomized. Each product was worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 9 hours. The wear periods were separated by 2 ± 1 days.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Binocular HC/HI Visual Acuity at Near (40 cm) Up to Hour 9 The participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal near eyesight. A negative logMAR value denotes better visual acuity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Binocular HC/HI Visual Acuity at Distance Up to Hour 9 The participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal distance eyesight. A negative logMAR value denotes better visual acuity.
Mean Monocular Over-refraction (OR) at Distance Up to Hour 9 OR is the amount of additional correction needed to improve visual acuity (VA). The OR at dispense was conducted with non-study product to determine lens power for the 9-hour wear. Dispensing of the study product (Pair 1 and Pair 2) was dependent upon lens power as determined by OR and resultant product availability. The OR at 9 hours was conducted with study product. All OR data is reported regardless whether study product was dispensed. Each eye contributed to the mean.