跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05502276
NCT05502276已完成不适用

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the Treatment of Difficult Colorectal Lesions With Dimensional Cut-off ≤ 30mm: Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG), "no Lift" Lesions and Residual / Relapses of Previous Resections. Endoscopic.

University of Roma La Sapienza2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2019年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
90
试验地点
2
主要终点
En-bloc resection rate

研究概览

简要总结

Compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection a full thickness (EFTR) with Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) System versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG), "no lift" lesions colon and residual / relapse on scars from previous resections endoscopic colon. The dimensional cut off of these lesions is ≤30mm

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients of age >18 years
  • Laterally Spreading Tumor Non Granular Type (LST-NG) ≤ 3cm in diameter
  • "no-lift" colic injuries ≤ 3cm in diameter
  • residual / recurrence on the scar of previous endoscopic resections of the colon ≤ 3cm in diameter

排除标准

  • pregnant women
  • failure to accept or understand the consent to participate in the study
  • patients with severe coagulopathies
  • patients with short life expectancy (Charlson comorbidity index ≥8)
  • patients with expired general clinical conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3)

结局指标

主要结局

En-bloc resection rate

时间窗: 1 year

the rate of one-piece resection of the lesions

R0 resection rate

时间窗: 1 year

percentage of patients with histologically negative lateral and deep margins

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University of Roma La Sapienza
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Giulio Antonelli

Principal Investigator

University of Roma La Sapienza

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验