Validity of Digital Models Obtained With iTero® and Lava Digital® in Comparison With Plaster Models.
- Conditions
- Dentition/Teeth Measurement
- Registration Number
- NCT01934517
- Lead Sponsor
- Université de Montréal
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity, reliability and reproducibility of digital models obtained from iTero® and Lava Digital® in comparison with traditional plaster models.
- Detailed Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the validity, reliability and reproducibility of the dental measurements obtained on the digital models with iTero® in comparison with those obtained on the plaster models (gold standard) and on the digital models with Lava Digital®.
The secondary objective is to compare two different impression materials (i.e. alginate and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS)) and determine whether the impression material used affects the accuracy of the measurements.
Statistical analysis:
* Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) will be used to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of the measurements for each method, i.e. the plaster models and the digital models.
* A paired t-test will be used to determine the validity of the digital measurements with iTero®, and to compare the impression materials (alginate and PVS).
* A Bland-Altman plot will also be used to compare the two digital methods (Lava Digital® et iTero®) with the plaster models.
* Dahlberg coefficient will be used to evaluate the technical error associated with the measurements that will be made.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Aged between 12 and 30 years old (male or female)
- complete permanent dentition from first molar to the other first molar
- no interproximal modifications (e.g. decay, large restorations, abnormal tooth morphology) which could affect the mesio-distal width of the teeth
- Dentition with severe crowding (that could therefore affect the mesio-distal width of the teeth)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overjet one year Overjet: measured as the greatest horizontal distance from the labial surface of the lower central incisor to the most inferior point at the mesiodistal center of the upper central incisor
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Montreal, Faculty of Orthodontics
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada