Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05805280
NCT05805280
Recruiting
Not Applicable

IntravasCular Imaging-Guided Versus AngiogRaphy-GUided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Fermoropopliteal Artery Disease (ICARUS Trial); A Feasibility Study

Asan Medical Center8 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentNovember 27, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Femoropopliteal Disease
Sponsor
Asan Medical Center
Enrollment
100
Locations
8
Primary Endpoint
Number of major amputation of the target limb or target-lesion revascularization
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Objectives: 1) To evaluate the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound to assess lesion morphology, select an appropriate stent size and landing zone 2) To compare the primary patency rates after intra vascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided stent implantation for the treatment of fermoropopliteal artery segment lesions.

Hypothesis: One of the key determinants of the device failure is inappropriate landing zone, selection of smaller stent relative to the reference vessel diameter, and lack of high-pressure post-dilatation in a necessary post-stent segment. Therefore, intravascular ultrasound-guided selection of appropriate landing zone, stent size and balloon size for high pressure post-dilation may maximize the benefits of stent use and improve patency duration. the investigators hypothesize that intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation is superior to angiography-guided stent implantation with respect to 12 months primary patency in patients with significant femoropopliteal disease

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized comparison feasibility trial involving patients with significant femoropopliteal disease who are undergoing drug-eluting stent (paclitaxel-eluting, durable-polymer-coated Eluvia stent) implantation. Patients with symptoms attributable to limb ischemia are eligible for enrollment if the culprit lesions are suitable for stent implantation based on angiographic findings. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in session 7. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either intravascular ultrasound-guided or angiography-guided group immediately before the endovascular intervention. In the intravascular ultrasound-guided group, intravascular ultrasound will be either automatically (1 mm/sec) or manually (5-10 mm/sec) pulled back at a constant speed according to the lesion length. Stent size and length are selected by information acquired from on-line intravascular ultrasound examination, and adjunct high-pressure dilation is performed to achieve stent optimization based on the intravascular ultrasound finding. For the selection of the landing zone and stent length, intravascular ultrasound and fluoroscopy images should be recorded simultaneously to link intravascular ultrasound images with location preferably using a ruler. For the selection of stent size and assessment of stent optimization, external elastic membrane area (EEM) before ballooning and minimal stent area (MSA) (i.e, the smallest cross-sectional area within the stent) after post-dilation are assessed. intravascular ultrasound is used at any step of the procedure before, during, or after stenting. However, image examination is mandatory before and after stenting. In the angiography-guided group, stent size and length are chosen by visual estimation, and adjunctive high-pressure dilation is performed if an optimal result, defined as angiographic residual diameter stenosis of less than 30% by visual estimation and the absence of angiographically detected dissection, was not achieved. Stent size is chosen at the operator's discretion in both groups, with diameters 1 or 2 mm larger than the reference diameter assessed either by intravascular ultrasound or visual estimation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 27, 2020
End Date
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.

Part of cardiology, Principal Investigator, associate professor

Asan Medical Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men or women at least 20 years up to 85 years of age
  • Intermittent claudication or tissue loss suitable for elective endovascular intervention (Rutherford category 2,3,4, or 5)
  • Significant native superficial femoral or proximal popliteal artery lesions suitable for stent implantation. Restenotic lesions can be enrolled at least 12-month after the index procedure uding plain balloon or drug-coated balloon.
  • Total lesion length of 30 to 220 mm
  • Reference vessel diameter of 4 - 6 mm
  • The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Existence of a stent in the target vessel
  • Previous use of atherectomy device in the target vessel
  • Use of drug-coated balloon in the target vessel within 12-month
  • Untreatable significant stenosis or occlusion (diameter stenosis ≥70%) in all 3 infrapopliteal arteries (patient can be enrolled if at least 1 patent outflow artery to the ankle (diameter stenosis \<50%) can be achieved by treatment during the index procedure)
  • A known intolerance or contraindication to antiplatelet drugs (aspirin or clopidogrel)
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of major amputation of the target limb or target-lesion revascularization

Time Frame: 12 month after randomization

major amputation of the target limb through 12 months, or target-lesion revascularization through 12 months

patency at 12 months after treatment

Time Frame: 12 month after randomization

peak systolic velocity ratio 2.4 or lower as assessed by the duplex ultrasound, in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or bypass of the target lesion.

Number of procedure related death

Time Frame: 30 Days post procedure

procedure related death through 30 days post-procedure

Secondary Outcomes

  • technical success(within 24 hours)
  • Rutherford category score(12 month after randomization)
  • procedural success(within 24 hours)

Study Sites (8)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials