跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02708433
NCT02708433已完成不适用

Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2016年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
23
试验地点
1
主要终点
Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia

研究概览

简要总结

Anecdotal data suggest that the buffered form of the local anesthetic is more potent at equal dosages, and a lower dosage of the drug might be used with an effect equal to higher dosage not buffered. Clinical data are needed to confirm these anecdotal data. No data exist comparing buffered local anesthetics at lower drug concentrations to current dosages commonly used in dental and oral surgical procedures

详细描述

Specific Aims:

Compare clinical depths of pulpal anesthesia (cold, Electronic Pulp Test) for mandibular molar, and canine teeth at 30 minute intervals post injection for mandibular block anesthesia with buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Hypotheses:

No differences exist in anesthetic depth for pulpal anesthesia after intraoral injection for mandibular block anesthesia between buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine as compared to non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

Study Time Frame: 6 months Month One: Recruit 24 volunteers as subjects. Prepare case-books. Months Two-Three: Clinical Study, Months Four-Five: Analyze data Month Six: Prepare Abstracts, Papers Methods: Blinded, Randomized Clinical Design Recruit subjects with Institutional Review Board approved consent at UNC Subjects will serve as their own controls in a cross-over AB/BA study design which is uniform within sequences, uniform within periods, and balanced Randomized subjects to be injected orally for mandibular block (inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves) alternatively with 4cc of buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine and 4cc non-buffered of 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 epinephrine.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-30 years, ASA I

排除标准

  • Allergy to lidocaine class of anesthetic drugs Local anesthetic drug use in past week Current symptoms teeth or oral mucosa

研究组 & 干预措施

Buffered 1% lidocaine

Active Comparator

In week one each subject would receive either anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves.

In week two the alternate anesthetic would be administered.

Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia

干预措施: Lidocaine (Drug)

Non-Buffered lidocaine

Active Comparator

In week two each subject would receive the alternate anesthetic (Buffered 1% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) or (Non-Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1/100,000 Epinephrine) to block the inferior alveolar, lingual, buccal nerves.

Mandibular molar and canine tested for pulpal anesthesia

干预措施: Lidocaine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Canine Anesthesia

时间窗: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

Subject's Mandibular canine teeth will be tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electronic Pulp Test for presence of anesthesia as reported by participants "yes" or "no."

Mean Time to Pulpal Response After Mandibular Molar Anesthesia

时间窗: Every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes total

Subject's Mandibular first molar teeth tested before anesthetic and every 30 minutes after for response to Cold and Electric Pulp Test as reported by subjects as a "yes" or "no."

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验