Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03328481
NCT03328481UnknownNot Applicable

Quadratus Lumborum Block Using Loss-of-resistance Versus Ultrasound-guided Technique

Cairo University1 site in 1 country16 target enrollmentStarted: May 28, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
16
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Duration of analgesia

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to explore the feasibility of using loss-of-resistance technique for Quadratus Lumborum block (QLB). And to compare between the Ultrasound guided QLB type II and the loss-of-resistance technique for QLB as regards the degree and duration of analgesia and side effects.

Detailed Description

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an abdominal plane block with increasing popularity. QLB is achieved by local anesthetic infiltration at the anterolateral aspect of quadratus lumborum muscle (QLB-I), or at the posterior aspect of the muscle (QLB-II), or transmuscular (QL-TM block). Ultrasound-guided technique is the usual route used for QLB performance. QLB had been considered a modification of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block[4]. A cadaveric study had showed similar local anesthetic spread in both QL and TAP blocks.

TAP block could be performed by using either the ultrasound or loss-of-resistance technique; whilst, QLB is only performed using the ultrasound and the feasibility of loss-of-resistance technique had not been investigated for this block.

This study aims to explore the feasibility of using loss-of-resistance technique for QLB. And to compare between the Ultrasound guided QLB type II and the loss-of-resistance technique for QLB as regards the degree and duration of analgesia and side effects.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal to regional block,
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Inflammation or infection at the puncture site
  • History of allergic reaction to study medications

Arms & Interventions

Loss-of-resistance

Experimental

Patients in this group will receive Loss-of-resistance Quadratus lumborum block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in addition to general anesthesia.

Intervention: Loss-of-resistance Quadratus lumborum block (Procedure)

Loss-of-resistance

Experimental

Patients in this group will receive Loss-of-resistance Quadratus lumborum block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in addition to general anesthesia.

Intervention: General anesthesia (Procedure)

Ultrasound-guided

Active Comparator

Patients in this group will receive Ultrasound-guided Quadratus lumborum block type-II with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in addition to general anesthesia.

Intervention: General anesthesia (Procedure)

Ultrasound-guided

Active Comparator

Patients in this group will receive Ultrasound-guided Quadratus lumborum block type-II with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25% in addition to general anesthesia.

Intervention: Ultrasound-guided Quadratus lumborum block (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Duration of analgesia

Time Frame: 24 hours

The time between the end of the surgery and the first analgesia request

Secondary Outcomes

  • Postoperative morphine consumption(24 hours)
  • Intraoperative extra-analgesia requirements(3 hours)
  • visual analogue pain score at rest to assess the pain severity(24 hours)
  • Visual analogue pain score at movement to assess the pain severity(24 hours)
  • Systolic blood pressure(24 hours)
  • Heart rate(24 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Hasanin

Assistant professor

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials