TEAMS R34 #3: Team Communication Training for Pediatric Depression Screening
- Conditions
- DepressionChildren
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Early Identification Universal Depression ScreeningBehavioral: Team Communication Training
- Registration Number
- NCT06527196
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Brief Summary
Pediatric depression is a global concern that has fueled efforts for enhanced detection and treatment engagement. While many health systems have implemented components of depression screening protocols, there is limited evidence of effective follow-up for pediatric depression. A key barrier to prompt service linkage is timely team communication and coordination between clinicians and staff across service areas. This project aims to refine and test a team communication training implementation strategy to improve implementation of an existing pediatric depression screening protocol in a large pediatric healthcare system. The implementation strategy will target team mechanisms at the organizational-level and provider-level. Team communication training is hypothesized to lead to improved, efficient, and effective decision-making to increase the frequency of depression screening and timely service linkage. Findings are expected to yield better understanding of how to optimize team communication activities and patterns in the pediatric depression screening to treatment cascade. This should also culminate in improved patient engagement and outcomes, which are critical to address the youth mental health crisis.
- Detailed Description
Aim 1: Use mixed methods to refine a team communication training implementation strategy to improve implementation of an existing health system universal depression screening protocol (clinical intervention)
Aim 2: Use a two-arm hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness pilot trial to assess the initial effectiveness of the team communication training strategy on implementation of the depression screening protocol.
Aim 3: Use mixed methods to assess team/organizational (intra-organizational alignment, implementation climate) and team member/provider (communication, coordination, psychological safety, shared cognitions) mechanisms of the team communication training implementation strategy and a novel application of natural language processing methods.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion criteria for all groups of participants are intentionally broad to ensure valid analyses:
- Employed as medical staff and/or a medical or health provider at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego.
- Experience providing or supporting care to children and adolescents with mental health care needs.
Any individual that does not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded from study participation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Early Identification Universal Depression Screening Condition Early Identification Universal Depression Screening In the comparison implementation strategy (early identification universal depression screening), multiple discrete strategies will used including depression screening training in which providers and staff are provided: 1. Training in the depression screening tool (Patient Health Questionnaire) 2. Orientation to the clinical pathway (i.e., screening conducted at every urgent care or emergency department visit and every 30 days for all other medical visits) 3. Expectations for handoff to the next step in the care cascade Team Communication Training Condition Team Communication Training The team communication training intervention will include: 1. Two initial 2-hour didactic sessions on effective communication between team members (information-based methods) and simulation exercises based on mock clinical cases (practice-based methods) 2. Biweekly performance feedback about intra-team communication in the electronic medical record (demonstration-based methods) provided during regularly scheduled supervision meetings 3. 1-hour booster coaching sessions approximately every 2 months. It is expected that team communication training will take place in the context of weekly or bi-weekly clinical supervision meetings to fit within routine clinical workflows.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Referral Processing Time 6 months Referral processing, will be based on the time (in hours) from screening to referral based on electronic health record (EHR) timestamps. This will be used to help assess workflow efficiency.
Mental Health Service Linkage (Caregiver Report of Successful Mental Health Service Linkage) 3 months, 6 months Successful mental health service linkage will be assessed by obtaining caregivers' reports of linkage to any mental health service (internal and external of study's chosen pediatric healthy system) following an elevated depression score on the PHQ-9 (10+).
Context: The Patient Health Questionnaire asks respondents to answer 9 questions that assess mental health status over the patient's last two weeks. Patients answer each question on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) up to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are calculated by adding individual values together to produce a cumulative score (can range from 0 to 27). A higher score indicates a higher risk for depression symptomology. For the pediatric health system in this study, a score above 10 warrants referral to a behavioral health professional, as well as educational materials and other service referrals.Provider Response Based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months This measure will be obtained by using the electronic health record (EHR) to determine whether or not providers responded to a patient with an elevated score (10+) on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). This will help researchers assess clinical outcomes of the study intervention (team communication training).
Context: The Patient Health Questionnaire asks respondents to answer 9 questions that assess mental health status over the patient's last two weeks. Patients answer each question on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) up to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are calculated by adding individual values together to produce a cumulative score (can range from 0 to 27). A higher score indicates a higher risk for depression symptomology. For the pediatric health system in this study, a score above 10 warrants referral to a behavioral health professional, as well as educational materials and other service referrals.Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Intervention Measure 6 months This 9-item instrument will be administered to participants following completion of the study intervention. The measure was designed to assess the degree to which the intervention is well-received (acceptability), relevant in the given setting (appropriate), and possible and workable (feasibility). The items on the measure (9 total) are each rated on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Following completion, individual subscales (3 total) can be obtained by averaging participants' responses for each of the three components (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility).
Referral Quality (Provider Report of Successful Mental Health Service Referrals) 6 months Referral quality is a measure based on providers' reports of whether referral to the a behavioral health service occurred or not. This will be used to assess workflow efficiency.
Time to Mental Health Service Linkage Baseline, 3 months, 6 months This measure captures time (days) to service linkage for patients that need referrals based on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score. This data will be obtained from the electronic health record (EHR). This will help researchers assess clinical outcomes of the study intervention (team communication training).
Context: The Patient Health Questionnaire asks respondents to answer 9 questions that assess mental health status over the patient's last two weeks. Patients answer each question on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) up to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are calculated by adding individual values together to produce a cumulative score (can range from 0 to 27). A higher score indicates a higher risk for depression symptomology. For the pediatric health system in this study, a score above 10 warrants referral to a behavioral health professional, as well as educational materials and other service referrals.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implementation Climate Measure Baseline, 3 months, 6 months Implementation climate will be measured with the Implementation Climate Measure. Implementation climate refers to the belief amongst users of an innovation within an organization that utilizing said innovation is rewarded, supported and expected. This instrument consists of 6 items that assess implementation with two questions per climate dimension (expected, supported, and rewarded). The instrument is based on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Scores are averaged across multiple items to give an overall score or subscale score for implementation climate. Generally, a higher score indicates a more positive perception of implementation climate in an organization. This instrument will be administered to participants through study completion.
Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD) Baseline, 3 months, 6 months The CSACD instrument (6 items total) will be used to assess communication and coordination. For each question, participants respond based on a 7-point likert-type scale where 1= strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree. 2 individual subscales (3 questions each) can be obtained by averaging responses for the items related to collaboration and the items related to satisfaction.
Card Sorting Activity Baseline, 3 months, 6 months Card sorting is a research assessment to elicit individual mental models about a participant's understanding of a situation, event, or process. Within team contexts, card sorting can be used to interrogate the extent to which team members have aligned thinking about key elements of a situation, event or process, i.e., team mental models.
In open card sorts participants are given a set of main concepts and told to sort them into different categories. Each makes a specific label for each category. In closed card sorts, participants are also given a set of key concepts, but participants are instead given pre-existing categories to sort concepts into. Each participant from the Aim 2 trial will complete the card-sorting task following team communication training completion to assess team mental models of member roles, responsibilities, and goals across depression care cascade team members.Edmonson's Psychological Safety (Interpersonal Risk Taking) Climate Measure Baseline, 3 months, 6 months Psychological safety, which refers to an individual's understanding that the workplace, (specifically the policies/procedures) cultivates a safe arena for interpersonal risk taking, will be measured using Edmonson's Psychological Safety Climate Measure. Participants respond to 7 items total with answer choices from 0 (doesn't apply at all) up to 4 (entirely applies). Scale scores are then determined by averaging responses to each item. Generally, a higher score indicates a stronger perception of psychological safety within the team.
Family Demographics Questionnaire Baseline, 3 months, 6 months Child demographics will be obtained using a Family Demographics Questionnaire and the electronic health record (EHR).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UC San Diego: IN STEP Children's Mental Health Research Center
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States