NL-OMON30444
Completed
Phase 4
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 5 % against 1.25 % povidone-iodine solution in preoperative antisepsis for strabismus surgery in young children. - 1.25% vs 5% povidone-iodine antisepsis for strabismus surgery in children
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
- Enrollment
- 100
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •(1\) Children \< 6 years of age (2\) undergoing surgery for strabismus for the first time, including any recession and/or resection surgery of the medial and/or lateral rectus muscles. (3\) Children willing to take part in all aspects of the study and written informed consent on the study participation of the child provided by the parents.
Exclusion Criteria
- •(1\) Any history or current condition of hypersensitivity to iodine. (2\) Children on topical antibiotic within the last 30 days. (3\) Children with signs of acute conjunctivitis, blepharitis, dacryocystitis or respiratory infection within the last 30 days. (4\) Children with asthma or similar chronic, obstructive pulmonary disorder (5\) Insufficiently treated amblyopia, i.e. visual acuity must be equal in both eyes or not differ by more than 1 LogMAR line (or equivalent in preverbal children).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 5 % against 1 % povidone-iodine solution in preoperative antisepsis for strabismus surgery in young children.Endophthalmitis (E) after strabismus surgery (S) leading to blindness is caused by eyelid and conjunctival bacteria. Povidone-iodine(PI) solutions between 1% and 5% reduce the number of bacteria on the conjunctiva and the incidence of E after S. In cataract surgery 5% PI was shown to be more effective than 1% PI in decreasing the conjunctival bacterial flora. As E after S especially afflicts younger children this study is to compare ocular antisepsis achieved by 5% PI vs 1.25% PI in children.MedDRA version: 8.1Level: PTClassification code 10049924Term: Infection prophylaxisEUCTR2006-004811-22-NLErasmus Medical Center Rotterdam250
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
A comparative study comparing anxiety reducing effect of tablet Lorazepam and tablet Alprazolam.Health Condition 1: K829- Disease of gallbladder, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/05/066874Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical sciences Lucknow Uttar pradesh
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
A study to compare an investigational ultra-rapid insulin LY900014 with Humalog given by insulin pump in people with type 1 diabetes.EUCTR2015-005358-36-ITELI LILLY & COMPANY, LILLY CORPORATE CENTER471
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
A study in people with type 1 diabetes to determine how well a meal-time insulin, LY900014, controls diabetes compared to Humalog (insulin lispro) when both are used along with a long-acting insulin.Type 1 DiabetesMedDRA version: 20.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10020639 Term: Hyperglycemia System Organ Class: 100000004861Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Hormonal diseases [C19]EUCTR2015-005356-99-DEEli Lilly and Company1,567
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparisonof a Long-Acting Basal Insulin Analog LY2963016 toLantus® in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - The ELEMENT 2 Studytype 2 diabetes mellitusMedDRA version: 14.1Level: PTClassification code 10067585Term: Type 2 diabetes mellitusSystem Organ Class: 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disordersTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases [C18]EUCTR2011-000828-15-HUEli Lilly and Company792