MedPath

Outcome of Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Therapy

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Caries
Pulpitis - Irreversible
Interventions
Procedure: Pulpotomy
Procedure: Non surgical root canal treatment
Registration Number
NCT05279781
Lead Sponsor
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

Root canal therapy (RCT) is indicated once the pulp is diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Despite favorable success rate reported for RCT in vital cases, it is time consuming, and might increases fracture susceptibility of teeth. With the advancement of materials and better understanding of pulpal healing, vital pulp therapy is practiced as an alternative treatment with high success rate. The aim of this study is to explore the outcome, quality of life and patient satisfaction after full pulpotomy compared to RCT.

Detailed Description

Permanent molar teeth with carious pulp exposure and mature roots as evident on the preoperative periapical radiograph will be included in the study. The teeth will be randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30). The first group will be treated with Biodentine full pulpotomy and the second group will be endodontically treated. Based on a previously validated questionnaire. The quality of life and satisfaction of patients after pulpotomy treatment will be evaluated compared to those after endodontic treatment. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be done 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pain level will be recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after treatment.

The questionnaire consists of five components:

1. Characteristics of the patient; including age, gender, socioeconomic status, smoking, oral hygiene practices, frequency of dental visits, and dental history.

2. Postoperative complications including postoperative pain, discomfort,or swelling.

These symptoms will be evaluated after 1, 2, 3,5 and 7 days by contacting the patient on the phone and at follow up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.

3. Quality of life instruments designed

4. Semantic scales designed to evaluate patient satisfaction with the treatment received.

Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be recorded. Success will be defined as clinically asymptomatic tooth with no sinus tract or swelling or periapical lesion.

Data will be analysed statistically using appropriate tests based on the distribution of the results.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Medically fit patient
  • mature permanent tooth with deep caries
  • diagnosis of irreversible pulpits.
  • tooth is restored with a direct restoration
Exclusion Criteria
  • immature teeth
  • teeth were hemostasis cannot be achieved after pulpotomy
  • necrotic teeth
  • lack of response to cold test

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pulpotomy groupPulpotomyThis group will receive full pulpotomy
Root canal treatment groupNon surgical root canal treatmentThis group will receive complete root canal therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post operative pain level on visual analogue scale7 days

Pain level after treatment will be assessed on a visual analogy scale from 0-10, where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.

Post operative pain level on numerical pain scale7 days

Pain level after treatment will be assessed on a numerical scale from 0-10 where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical success6, 12, 24, 48 months

The tooth should be pain free, no sinus tract, no tenderness to palpation and no swelling. As measured by clinical examination

Radiographic success6, 12, 24, 48 months

Periapical x-ray will be taken it should show no bone lesions or root resorption

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jordan University of science and technology

🇯🇴

Irbid, Jordan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath