Identifying and Examining the Effects of Source and Presentation on Responses to Electronic Cigarette Public Education Messages in Young Adult Vapers and Non-vapers - Part 1
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 848
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Message Acceptance
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to use crowdsourcing to test the effects of a message source (expert and peer) and message presentation types (one-sided and two-sided) to identify the optimal message type for young adults who vape and do not vape.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 24 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •US residents ages 18-24
- •Fluent in English
- •Reporting either vaping in the past 30 days or not having vaped in the past 30 days but susceptible to vaping
排除标准
- •Age less than 18 or above 24
- •Not fluent in English
- •Not a member of partnering crowdsourcing behavioral research platform conducting the study
研究组 & 干预措施
Expert, one-sided
Participants assigned to the expert, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
干预措施: Expert, one-sided (Other)
Expert, two-sided
Participants assigned to the expert, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
干预措施: Expert, two-sided (Other)
Peer, one-sided
Participants assigned to the peer, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
干预措施: Peer, one-sided (Other)
Peer, two-sided
Participants assigned to the peer, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
干预措施: Peer, two-sided (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Message Acceptance
时间窗: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Participants' self-reported message acceptance were measured by using a five-point Likert scale using five items assessing whether participants thought the message was worth remembering, grabbed their attention, powerful, convincing, and meaningful on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score, and this was done for each arm for each vaping status. Higher scores indicate more more message acceptance, therefore better outcomes.
Harm Perceptions
时间窗: After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Harm perceptions was measured by a single item e-cigarette harm perceptions question assessing participants' perceived absolute harm of e-cigarette use on a scale from 1 (Not at all harmful) to 10 (Very harmful). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater vaping harm perceptions, therefore indicating better outcome.
次要结局
- Negative Cognition(After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
- Message Anger(After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
- Message Liking(After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
- Source Trust(After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
- Attitudes(After exposure to all messages (approximately up to 45 minutes), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
- Behavioral Intentions to Vape or Try Vaping(After exposure to all messages (approximately up to 45 minutes), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.)
研究者
Donghee Nicole Lee
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of Massachusetts, Worcester