跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05784181
NCT05784181招募中不适用

Bipolar Versus Laser Enaculation of Prostate for >80gram Prostate .

Menoufia University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2021年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
compare the efficacy of Bipolar versus Laser enaculation of prostate for >80gram.

研究概览

简要总结

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP ) still the gold standerad for surgical management of enlarged prostate .However , many minimally invasive procedures are now in the comparative track with Bipolar resection as Laser enaculation.

Holmium laser prostatectomy was introduced since 1994 . different types of uses by laser were introduced either resection or enaculation with good outcomes and less complications .

One of the most important issues related to large prostate management is the retreatment after Bipolar resection , another issue that prolonged catheter time post resection .

详细描述

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP ) still the gold standerad for surgical management of enlarged prostate .However , many minimally invasive procedures are now in the comparative track with Bipolar resection as Laser enaculation.

Holmium laser prostatectomy was introduced since 1994 . different types of uses by laser were introduced either resection or enaculation with good outcomes and less complications .

One of the most important issues related to large prostate management is the retreatment after Bipolar resection , another issue that prolonged catheter time post resection , so , we try to analyze the effect of Laser enaculation of the prostate in comparison to Bipolar resection in prostate more than 80 gm .

Aim of the work:

Aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of Bipolar versus Laser enaculation of prostate for >80gram.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •similar for all patients prostatic volume more than 80 gm , peak urinary flow rate measurement (Qmax) <15 ml/s, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of >8 , postvoid residual (PVR) <400 ml

排除标准

  • •Patients with prostate size less than 80gm , urethral stricture, acute urinary tract infection, repeated treatment .

研究组 & 干预措施

patients prostatic volume more than 80 gm turp by bipolar resection

Other

pt with 80gm prostate size underwent bipolar resection

干预措施: bipolar transurethral resection and Laser enaculation by holmium: YAG laser (Device)

patients prostatic volume more than 80 gm turp by Laser enaculation by holmium: YAG laser

Other

pt with 80gm prostate size underwent Laser enaculation by holmium: YAG laser

干预措施: bipolar transurethral resection and Laser enaculation by holmium: YAG laser (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

compare the efficacy of Bipolar versus Laser enaculation of prostate for >80gram.

时间窗: 1 year

compare the efficacy of Bipolar versus Laser enaculation of prostate for \>80gram.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hossam Kandeel

Yassin Abdel Ghaffar St- from Gamal Abdel Anasar St - Faculty of Medicine.

Menoufia University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验