跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06531148
NCT06531148尚未招募不适用

A Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of the Efficacy of Chemo-mechanical Caries Removal Versus Conventional Caries Removal Methods in Children: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Mansoura University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2024年7月31日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical evaluation

研究概览

简要总结

This study will be conducted to Assess the clinical and microbiological efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (CarieMove® Gel) versus conventional excavation method in children.

The assessed parameters will be:

  • Efficacy of caries removal.
  • Pain reaction and mean time required for the treatment.
  • Total bacterial count before and after treatment.

详细描述

Subjects:

A total of 30 children 7-9 years old with no history of systematic disease will be recruited from the out-patient pediatric dental clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.

Each child with the following criteria will be eligible for the present study (22).

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Cooperative child
  2. Each child has two bilateral first permanent molars with simple Class 1 occlusal caries involving dentin.
  3. The carious first permanent molars are free from clinical and radiographic evidence of pulp involvement.
  4. The selected molars should have normal structure and morphology.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Care Provider)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Cooperative child
  • Each child has two bilateral first permanent molars with simple Class 1 occlusal caries involving dentin.
  • The carious first permanent molars are free from clinical and radiographic evidence of pulp involvement.
  • The selected molars should have normal structure and morphology.

排除标准

  • 1- Un-cooperative child 2- Molars with clinical and radiographic signs of pulp involvement. 3- Children with special health care needs. 4- Molars which have already been restored or have developmental anomaly.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical evaluation

时间窗: 11.2 ± 3.3 min

A-Efficacy: B- Child satisfaction and pain experience: C-Time assessment

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验